Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35288790›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2022

Biological Matrix Supply Chain Shortages: More Matrices Are Now Rare-the Case for Surrogate Matrices.

Evan A Dubiel, Heather Myler, Mark E Arnold, Patrick Bennett, Jeff Gatz, Elizabeth Groeber, Seema Gupta, Cheikh Kane, Fumin Li, William Mylott and 5 more

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Evan A DubielPPD Clinical Research Services, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2244 Dabney Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23230-3323, USA.
Heather MylerPPD Clinical Research Services, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2244 Dabney Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23230-3323, USA. Heather.Myler@ppd.com.
Mark E ArnoldLabcorp Drug Development, 8211 SciCor Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46214, USA.
Patrick BennettAlliance Pharma Inc., 17 Lee Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania, 19355, USA.
Jeff GatzBioIVT LLC, PO Box 770, Hicksville, New York, 11802, USA.
Elizabeth GroeberCharles River Laboratories, 1407 George Rd, Ashland, Ohio, 44805, USA.
Seema GuptaPPD Clinical Research Services, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2244 Dabney Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23230-3323, USA.
Cheikh KaneKCAS Bioanalytical and Biomarker Services, 12400 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Shawnee, Kansas, 66216, USA.
Fumin LiPPD Clinical Research Services, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2244 Dabney Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23230-3323, USA.
William MylottPPD Clinical Research Services, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2244 Dabney Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23230-3323, USA.
Courtney NoahBioIVT LLC, PO Box 770, Hicksville, New York, 11802, USA.
Mark O'DellLabcorp Drug Development, 8211 SciCor Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46214, USA.
Eric TewaltPPD Clinical Research Services, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2244 Dabney Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23230-3323, USA.
Dominic WarrinoKCAS Bioanalytical and Biomarker Services, 12400 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Shawnee, Kansas, 66216, USA.
Andrew VickCharles River Laboratories, 1407 George Rd, Ashland, Ohio, 44805, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the biological matrix supply chain. An upsurge in demand driven by numerous COVID-19 therapeutic and vaccine development programs to combat the pandemic, along with logistical challenges sourcing and transporting matrix, has led to increased lead times for multiple matrices. Biological matrix shortages can potentially cause significant delays in drug development programs across the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. Given the current circumstances, discussion is warranted around what will likely be increased use of surrogate matrices in support of pharmacokinetic (PK), immunogenicity, and biomarker assays for regulatory filings. Regulatory authorities permit the use of surrogate matrix in bioanalytical methods in instances where matrix is rare or difficult to obtain, as long as the surrogate is appropriately selected and scientifically justified. Herein, the scientific justification and possible regulatory implications of employing surrogate matrix in PK, immunogenicity, and biomarker assays are discussed. In addition, the unique challenges that cell and gene therapy (C&GT) and other innovative therapeutic modalities place on matrix supply chains are outlined. Matrix suppliers and contract research organizations (CROs) are actively implementing mitigation strategies to alleviate the current strain on the matrix supply chain and better prepare the industry for any future unexpected strains. To maintain ethical standards, these mitigation strategies include projecting matrix needs with suppliers at least 6 months in advance and writing or updating study protocols to allow for additional matrix draws from study subjects and/or re-purposing of subject matrix from one drug development program to another.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansbiomarkersimmunogenicitymatrixpharmacokineticsregulatory authorities

Identifiers

PMID35288790
PMCPMC8920421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.