ReviewHNO2023
[Preservation, reconstruction, and rehabilitation of the facial nerve].
Review in HNO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immediate and single-stage facial reanimation after radical parotidectomy and oncologic facial nerve sacrifice: A systematic review.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Peripheral facial palsy: contemporary advances and unresolved debates in management from pathogenic mechanisms to tailored reconstruction.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Management of Facial Paralysis Following Skull Base Surgery: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Audiology research · 2025Review
- Surgery for patients with facial palsy in Germany: a diagnosis-related-groups-based nationwide analysis, 2005-2019.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- Anatomical description of the extratemporal facial nerve under high-definition system: a microsurgical study in rats.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Handling of the facial nerve during surgery for parotid cancer is relevant for the patient's long-term quality of life. In about two thirds of cases, the facial nerve is not affected by the tumor. In these cases, in addition to complete tumor resection, identification and preservation of the facial nerve are important components of a successful operation. If the nerve is infiltrated by the tumor, the affected part must be resected during radical parotidectomy. When possible, primary nerve reconstruction leads to the best long-term cosmetic and functional outcomes. Individual selection of the optimal treatment concept is based on clinical examination of facial muscle mobility, preoperative imaging to understand the positional relationship between tumor and nerve, and on the basis of an electrophysiological examination of nerve function. Intraoperatively, standardized dissection helps to identify and preserve the facial nerve. If radical parotidectomy is indicated, in addition to one-step reconstruction, preoperative diagnostic tests can help to plan postoperative adjuvant therapy. The aim of rehabilitation is restoration of facial tone, facial symmetry, and movement of the paralyzed face. Restoration of eye closure is of high importance. The surgical treatment of facial paralysis has seen many improvements in recent years. The present work provides an overview of the most recent advances in diagnostics, surgical techniques, and further possibilities for preventing damage to the normal facial nerve during parotid cancer treatment. Furthermore, the options for rehabilitation of the tumor-infiltrated facial nerve in the context of treatment of salivary gland malignancies are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.