ArticleNature2022
Open science, done wrong, will compound inequities.
Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quantifying research waste in ecology.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Pooled it
- What helps and hinders reproducible research? Researchers' perspectives from a cross-disciplinary interview study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Provide proactive reproducible analysis transparency with every publication.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- From impact metrics and open science to communicating research: Journalists' awareness of academic controversies.PloS one · 2025Article
- Reimagining open science for global health: Epistemic power and the pursuit of health equity.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Integrating open education practices with data analysis of open science in an undergraduate course.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- "Best Paper" awards lack transparency, inclusivity, and support for Open Science.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Opening science to society: how to progress societal engagement into (open) science policies.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science.Research integrity and peer review · 2024Article
- The landscape of open science in behavioral addiction research: Current practices and future directions.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2023Review
- Open Science 2.0: Towards a truly collaborative research ecosystem.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Is Open Science Neoliberal?Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023Article
- Article
- Little transparency and equity in scientific awards for early- and mid-career researchers in ecology and evolution.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Strategic priorities for reproducibility reform.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- A guide to open science practices for animal research.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Engaging the open science framework in quantifying and tracing scientists' research credits.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35288691What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.