ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2022
Health benefits from cleaner vehicles and increased active transportation in Seattle, Washington.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Co-Created, Community-Informed Model for Electric Vehicle Adoption in Disadvantaged Communities.Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment · 2025Article
- Xenobiotic Toxicants and Particulate Matter: Effects, Mechanisms, Impacts on Human Health, and Mitigation Strategies.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
- Active transportation is associated with lower obesity risk: generalized structural equations model applied to physical activity.Cadernos de saude publica · 2025Article
- Electric vehicles and health: A scoping review.Environmental research · 2024Article
- 3 Months without the car in Bielefeld, Germany- a mixed-method study exploring individual motivation to participate in a municipal intervention.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Effects of public transportation use on non-exercise activity thermogenesis and health promotion: a mini-review.Physical activity and nutrition · 2024Article
- A scoping review of the health co-benefits of climate mitigation strategies in South America.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2023Article
- Invited Perspective: Studying Walkability and Cancer Incidence-A Step in the Right Direction.Environmental health perspectives · 2023Article
- California's early transition to electric vehicles: Observed health and air quality co-benefits.The Science of the total environment · 2023Article
- Climate change and allergic diseases: A scoping review.The journal of climate change and healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClimate mitigation policies that focus on the transportation sector yield near-term health co-benefits that could motivate policy action.
objectiveWe quantified CO
methodsWe compared a business-as-usual scenario projected to 2035 with intervention scenarios in which 35% of gasoline vehicles were switched to EV, and 50% of car trips less than 8 kilometers were replaced by walking or bicycling. We modeled changes in primary traffic-generated oxides of nitrogen (NO
resultsIncreasing the use of EV, walking, and bicycling is estimated to reduce CO SIGNIFICANCE: Moving towards cleaner vehicles and active transportation can reduce CO IMPACT STATEMENT: Using key components of the health impact assessment framework, we quantify the environmental and health benefits of urban transportation policy scenarios that promote electric vehicle use and replace short car trips with walking and bicycling as compared with a business as usual scenario in 2035. Our findings demonstrate that transportation scenarios promoting cleaner vehicles and active transportation can reduce CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.