Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35288578›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

High-resolution population estimation using household survey data and building footprints.

Gianluca Boo, Edith Darin, Douglas R Leasure, Claire A Dooley, Heather R Chamberlain, Attila N Lázár, Kevin Tschirhart, Cyrus Sinai, Nicole A Hoff, Trevon Fuller and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in small area population estimation in the absence of national census data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mapping subnational gender gaps in internet and mobile adoption using social media data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gianluca BooWorldPop, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. gianluca.boo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4078-8221
Edith DarinWorldPop, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8176-092X
Douglas R LeasureWorldPop, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Claire A DooleyWorldPop, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2415-9895
Heather R ChamberlainWorldPop, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0828-6974
Attila N LázárWorldPop, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2033-2013
Kevin TschirhartCenter for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Cyrus SinaiUCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4585-9575
Nicole A HoffUCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1770-6304
Trevon FullerUCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-4267
Kamy MuseneUCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Arly BatumboBureau Central du Recensement, Institut National de la Statistique, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Anne W RimoinUCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0662-9067
Andrew J TatemWorldPop, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7270-941X

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-009579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The national census is an essential data source to support decision-making in many areas of public interest. However, this data may become outdated during the intercensal period, which can stretch up to several decades. In this study, we develop a Bayesian hierarchical model leveraging recent household surveys and building footprints to produce up-to-date population estimates. We estimate population totals and age and sex breakdowns with associated uncertainty measures within grid cells of approximately 100 m in five provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, a country where the last census was completed in 1984. The model exhibits a very good fit, with an R

Indexed as

CensusesBayes TheoremUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID35288578
PMCPMC8921279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.