Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35288385›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Impact of '4+7' volume-based drug procurement on the use of policy-related original and generic drugs: a natural experimental study in China.

Jing Wang, Ying Yang, Luxinyi Xu, Yuan Shen, Xiaotong Wen, Lining Mao, Quan Wang, Dan Cui, Zongfu Mao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jing Wang *Department of Drug Information Management, Statistical Information Center, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Ying Yang *School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9252-5071
Luxinyi XuSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yuan ShenDepartment of Drug Information Management, Statistical Information Center, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Xiaotong WenSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0350-6181
Lining MaoSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Quan WangSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China alyssazz@126.com wangquan73@whu.edu.cn.
Dan CuiSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China alyssazz@126.com wangquan73@whu.edu.cn.
Zongfu MaoSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University · CNNational Health and Family Planning Commission · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of the first round of the National Centralized Drug Procurement pilot (so-called '4+7' policy) on the use of policy-related original and generic drugs.

methodsA retrospective natural experimental design was adopted. Drug procurement data from the China Drug Supply Information Platform database were used, involving 9 '4+7' pilot cities in intervention group and 12 non-pilot provinces in control group. '4+7' policy-related drugs were selected as study samples, including 25 drugs in the '4+7' procurement list and their alternative drugs that have not yet been covered by the policy. '4+7' List drugs were divided into bid-winning and non-winning products according to the bidding results. Included drugs were sorted into original and generic products. Difference-in-difference method was employed to estimate the net effect of policy impact.

resultsAfter policy intervention, the DDDs (defined daily doses) of '4+7' List original drugs significantly reduced (

conclusions'4+7' policy is conducive to generic substitution, drug price reduction and pharmaceutical cost-containment in China. The overall quality level of drug use of the Chinese population increased after policy intervention, especially in primary healthcare settings. However, the increased DDDc of non-winning generic drugs and alternative drugs should draw the importance of further policy monitoring.

Indexed as

Drug CostsDrugs, GenericChinaHumansPolicyRetrospective StudiesDrugs, Generichealth economicshealth policyhealth & safety

Identifiers

PMID35288385
PMCPMC8921850
OpenAlexW4220773535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.