Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35288292›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian journal of cardiology2022

The Multicenter Collaborative to Enhance Biologic Understanding, Quality, and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock (VANQUISH Shock): Rationale and Design.

Behnam N Tehrani, Stavros G Drakos, Filio Billia, Wayne B Batchelor, Adriana Luk, Kelly Stelling, Joseph Tonna, Carolyn Rosner, Thomas Hanff, Vivek Rao and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cardiogenic Shock: Searching for a Better Lifeboat.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Behnam N TehraniInova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
Stavros G DrakosUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Electronic address: stavros.drakos@hsc.utah.edu.
Filio BilliaPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: phyllis.billia@uhn.ca.
Wayne B BatchelorInova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA. Electronic address: wayne.batchelor@inova.org.
Adriana LukPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kelly StellingSentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
Joseph TonnaUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Carolyn RosnerInova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
Thomas HanffUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Vivek RaoPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nicolas A BrozziCleveland Clinic Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Weston, Florida, USA.
David A BaranCleveland Clinic Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Weston, Florida, USA. Electronic address: docbaran@gmail.com.

Funding

Optimizing Selection and Management of Cardiac Arrest Patients Treated with ECMOK23HL141596 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TONNA, JOSEPH EDWARD · 2018 to 2022
$945k
CSRD VA I01 CX002291NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL141596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite efforts to advance therapies in cardiogenic shock (CS), outcomes remain poor. This is likely due to several factors, including major gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology, phenotyping of patients, and challenges with conducting adequately powered clinical studies. An unmet need exists for a comprehensive multicentre "all-comers" prospective registry to facilitate characterising contemporary presentation, treatment (in a device-agnostic fashion), and short- and intermediate-term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) of CS patients.

methodsThe Multicenter Collaborative to Enhance Biological Understanding, Quality and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock (VANQUISH Shock) registry is a prospective observational registry that will study unrestricted adult patients with a primary diagnosis of CS at 4 North American centres with multidisciplinary shock programs. Both acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and acute heart failure (HF-CS) etiologies will be included, and the registry will be device agnostic and widely inclusive. The primary end point will be survival at 30 days after hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes will include in-hospital adverse events and survival to 6 and 12 months. Patients will also undergo neurologic and health-related QOL assessments with the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) health survey tools before discharge and during follow-up. Serial biospecimens will facilitate biomarker studies.

conclusionsThe VANQUISH Shock registry provides a unique opportunity to study the pathophysiology, contemporary management, clinical course, and outcomes of CS. By capturing detailed and high-quality longitudinal data, the registry will address existing knowledge gaps and serve as a springboard for future mechanistic clinical studies to advance the field.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsMyocardial InfarctionHospital MortalityHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRegistriesShock, CardiogenicTreatment OutcomeBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID35288292
PMCPMC10625804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.