Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35288224›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2022

A new approach to symmetric registration of longitudinal structural MRI of the human brain.

Babak A Ardekani, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. aXonica: A support package for MRI based Neuroimaging.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  6. Patterns of Impaired Neurocognitive Performance on the Global Neuropsychological Assessment, and Their Brain Structural Correlates in Recent-onset and Chronic Schizophrenia.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Babak A ArdekaniThe Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: ardekani@nki.rfmh.org.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Enhancement and Dissemination of ART: An Automatic Registration ToolboxR03EB008201 · NIBIB · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI ARDEKANI, BABAK A. · 2007 to 2007
$162k
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB008201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper presents the Automatic Temporal Registration Algorithm (ATRA) for symmetric rigid-body registration of longitudinal T NEW

methodThe notion of leave-one-out consistent (LOOC) landmarks with respect to a supervised landmark detection algorithm is introduced. An automatic algorithm is presented for identification of LOOC landmarks on MRI scans. Multiple sets of LOOC landmarks are identified on each volume and a Generalized Orthogonal Procrustes Analysis of the landmarks is used to find a rigid-body transformation of each volume into a common space where the volumes are aligned precisely.

resultsQualitative and quantitative evaluations of ATRA registration accuracy were performed using 2012 volumes from 503 subjects (4 longitudinal volumes/subject), and on a further 120 volumes acquired from 3 normal subjects (40 longitudinal volumes/subject). Since the ground truth registrations are unknown, we devised a novel method for showing that ATRA's registration accuracy is at least better than 0.5 mm translation or 0.5° rotation. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): In comparison with existing methods, ATRA does not require any image preprocessing (e.g., skull-stripping or intensity normalization) and can handle conditions where rigid-body motion assumptions are not true (e.g., movement in eyes, jaw, neck) and brain tissue loss over time in neurodegenerative diseases. In a systematic comparison with the FSL FLIRT algorithm, ATRA provided faster and more accurate registrations.

conclusionsThe algorithm is symmetric, in the sense that any permutation of the input volumes does not change the transformation matrices, and unbiased, in that all volumes undergo exactly one interpolation operation, which precisely aligns them in a common space. There is no interpolation bias and no reference volume. All volumes are treated exactly the same. The algorithm is fast and highly accurate.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsHeadHumansSkullBrainImage registrationInverse-consistent registrationLandmark detectionLongitudinal MRISymmetric registrationUnbiased registration

Identifiers

PMID35288224
PMCPMC9008769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.