Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35287956›Full record

ReviewInternational dental journal2022

Chlorhexidine in Dentistry: Pharmacology, Uses, and Adverse Effects.

Frank Poppolo Deus, Aviv Ouanounou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07016659 (Assessing Antiplaque And Antigingivitis Efficacy Of Triphala Mouthwash Versus Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Among A Group Of Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 204 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
44.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07016659 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Assessing Antiplaque And Antigingivitis Efficacy Of Triphala Mouthwash Versus Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Among A Group Of Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsPlaque Accumulation, Gingival InflammationArms0.12% Chlorhexidine Mouthwash ( Hexitol ), Triphila mouthwash
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 330 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frank Poppolo DeusFaculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aviv OuanounouDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pharmacology and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: aviv.ouanounou@dentistry.utoronto.ca.
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this work was to review the current uses of chlorhexidine (CHX) in dentistry based on its mechanism of action, whilst highlighting the most effective protocols that render the highest clinical efficacy whilst limiting adverse drug reactions.

methodsA literature search was conducted using the key words chlorhexidine, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and dentistry using databases in the University of Toronto library system. The titles and abstracts were read, and relevant articles were selected.

resultsA total of 1100 publications were identified, 100 were investigated, and 67 of them were used. Out of the 67 selected articles, 12 were reviews on CHX; 5 articles focussed on CHX gels; 13 focussed on CHX mouthwashes; 8 focussed on CHX products; 13 discussed adverse effects associated with CHX; 13 focussed on periodontal pathology and treatment; 6 focussed on implant periodontal and dental surgeries; 7 evaluated effects on caries; 6 looked at the mechanisms of action; and 12 focussed on the antibacterial and antimicrobial impact on the oral biome. There were multiple areas of overlap amongst the articles, and results showed that CHX provides different uses, but mainly as an adjunct to various treatments. Mouthwash was the most superior medium when used in short time spans when mechanical prophylaxis was not possible for the prevention of gingivitis and maintenance of oral hygiene. CHX products are often used in periodontics, post-oral surgical procedures, and as a prophylaxis for multiple invasive procedures with minimal adverse effects. Tooth staining was the most negative adverse effect reported by patients.

conclusionsCHX's antimicrobial properties make it an ideal prophylactic when mechanical debridement is not possible. CHX mouthwash appears to be more effective compared to gels. Concentrations of 0.12% to 0.2% are recommended; any mouthwash with concentrations above 0.2% will unnecessarily increase the unwanted side effects. CHX is useful amongst various areas of dentistry including oral surgery, periodontics, and even general dentistry. For long-term treatments, especially in periodontitis patients (stage I-III) undergoing nonsurgical treatments, CHX chips are recommended. CHX chips are also recommended as an adjunct to implant debridement in patients with peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis over CHX mouthwash and gels.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsChlorhexidineGelsHumansMouthwashesOral HygieneAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineGelsMouthwashesAdverse effectsChlorhexidineDentistryMechanism of action

Identifiers

PMID35287956
PMCPMC9275362
OpenAlexW4220715948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.