Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35287795›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Cerebellar modulation of memory encoding in the periaqueductal grey and fear behaviour.

Charlotte Lawrenson, Elena Paci, Jasmine Pickford, Robert A R Drake, Bridget M Lumb, Richard Apps

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Re-examining the Mysterious Role of the Cerebellum in Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Charlotte Lawrenson *School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4778-4677
Elena Paci *School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6202-2825
Jasmine PickfordSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Robert A R DrakeSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2381-7198
Bridget M LumbSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0268-6419
Richard AppsSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/MO19616/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203775/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pivotal role of the periaqueductal grey (PAG) in fear learning is reinforced by the identification of neurons in male rat ventrolateral PAG (vlPAG) that encode fear memory through signalling the onset and offset of an auditory-conditioned stimulus during presentation of the unreinforced conditioned tone (CS+) during retrieval. Some units only display CS+ onset or offset responses, and the two signals differ in extinction sensitivity, suggesting that they are independent of each other. In addition, understanding cerebellar contributions to survival circuits is advanced by the discovery that (i) reversible inactivation of the medial cerebellar nucleus (MCN) during fear consolidation leads in subsequent retrieval to (a) disruption of the temporal precision of vlPAG offset, but not onset responses to CS+, and (b) an increase in duration of freezing behaviour. And (ii) chemogenetic manipulation of the MCN-vlPAG projection during fear acquisition (a) reduces the occurrence of fear-related ultrasonic vocalisations, and (b) during subsequent retrieval, slows the extinction rate of fear-related freezing. These findings show that the cerebellum is part of the survival network that regulates fear memory processes at multiple timescales and in multiple ways, raising the possibility that dysfunctional interactions in the cerebellar-survival network may underlie fear-related disorders and comorbidities.

Indexed as

FearPeriaqueductal GrayAnimalsCerebellumConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantMaleRatscerebellumfearneurosciencePAGratsurvival circuitstiming

Identifiers

PMID35287795
PMCPMC8923669
OpenAlexW4220820573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.