Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35287781›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2022

Cultural modification of neuropsychiatric assessment: complexities to consider.

Sandila Tanveer, Matthew J Croucher, Richard Porter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. BJPsych open · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandila TanveerDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Matthew J CroucherDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand; and Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Richard PorterDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand; and Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8695-3966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive screening tests are culture bound and have been shown to perform differently depending on the culture, even with adequate translation. Khan et al examine in detail ways in which the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been modified for different languages and cultures and produce a systematic guide for future modifications. However, questions arise regarding the availability of the MoCA. Other important issues in the transcultural use and modification of neuropsychiatric tests include providing a culturally safe context for testing, understanding the cultural context in which screening takes place and assessing other neuropsychiatric conditions, which may manifest differently in different cultural contexts and which affect cognition.

Indexed as

cognitive neuroscienceDementiadepressive disorderslow- and middle-income countriespsychological testing

Identifiers

PMID35287781
PMCPMC8935941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.