Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35287742›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2022

Movement ecology of vulnerable lowland tapirs between areas of varying human disturbance.

E P Medici, S Mezzini, C H Fleming, J M Calabrese, M J Noonan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

E P MediciLowland Tapir Conservation Initiative (LTCI), Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas (IPÊ), Rodovia Dom Pedro I, km 47, Nazaré Paulista, São Paulo, 12960-000, Brazil. medici@ipe.org.br.
S MezziniThe Irving K. Barber Faculty of Science, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, Canada.
C H FlemingUniversity of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, USA.
J M CalabreseCenter for Advanced Systems Understanding (CASUS), Görlitz, Germany.
M J NoonanThe Irving K. Barber Faculty of Science, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-0535
University of British Columbia · CAHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DEInternational Union for Conservation of Nature (Bangladesh) · BDSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute · US

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2021-02758National Science Foundation IIBR 1915347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal movement is a key ecological process that is tightly coupled to local environmental conditions. While agriculture, urbanisation, and transportation infrastructure are critical to human socio-economic improvement, these have spurred substantial changes in animal movement across the globe with potential impacts on fitness and survival. Notably, however, human disturbance can have differential effects across species, and responses to human activities are thus largely taxa and context specific. As human disturbance is only expected to worsen over the next decade it is critical to better understand how species respond to human disturbance in order to develop effective, case-specific conservation strategies.

methodsHere, we use an extensive telemetry dataset collected over 22 years to fill a critical knowledge gap in the movement ecology of lowland tapirs (Tapirus terrestris) across areas of varying human disturbance within three biomes in southern Brazil: the Pantanal, Cerrado, and Atlantic Forest.

resultsFrom these data we found that the mean home range size across all monitored tapirs was 8.31 km

conclusionsContrary to our expectations, although we observed individual variability in lowland tapir space use and movement, human impacts on the landscape also had no measurable effect on their movement. Lowland tapir movement behaviour thus appears to exhibit very little phenotypic plasticity in response to human disturbance. Crucially, the lack of any detectable response to anthropogenic disturbance suggests that human modified habitats risk being ecological traps for tapirs and this information should be factored into conservation actions and species management aimed towards protecting lowland tapir populations.

Indexed as

AnthropoceneContinuous-time movement modellingHome rangeHuman Footprint IndexSpace use

Identifiers

PMID35287742
PMCPMC8919628
OpenAlexW4220831882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.