Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35287678›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

Nurses' experiences with continuous vital sign monitoring on the general surgical ward: a qualitative study based on the Behaviour Change Wheel.

J P L Leenen, E M Dijkman, A van Hout, C J Kalkman, L Schoonhoven, G A Patijn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

J P L LeenenDepartment of Surgery, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands. j.p.l.leenen@isala.nl.
E M DijkmanDepartment of Surgery, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
A van HoutResearch Group IT Innovations in Health Care, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Campus 2-6, Zwolle, 8017CA, The Netherlands.
C J KalkmanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
L SchoonhovenJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G A PatijnDepartment of Surgery, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Reformed University of Applied Sciences · NLIsala · NLUniversity of Southampton · GBUtrecht University · NLWindesheim University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

Isala Innovation & Science Fund INNO1937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo support early recognition of clinical deterioration on a general ward continuous vital signs monitoring (CMVS) systems using wearable devices are increasingly being investigated. Although nurses play a crucial role in successful implementation, reported nurse adoption and acceptance scores vary significantly. In-depth insight into the perspectives of nurses regarding CMVS is lacking. To this end, we applied a theoretical approach for behaviour change derived from the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW).

aimTo provide insight in the capability, opportunity and motivation of nurses working with CMVS, in order to inform future implementation efforts.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted, including twelve nurses of a surgical ward in a tertiary teaching hospital with previous experience of working with CMVS. Semi-structured interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis. The results were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour (COM-B) model of the BCW.

resultsFive key themes emerged. The theme 'Learning and coaching on the job' linked to Capability. Nurses favoured learning about CVSM by dealing with it in daily practice. Receiving bedside guidance and coaching was perceived as important. The theme 'interpretation of vital sign trends' also linked to Capability. Nurses mentioned the novelty of monitoring vital sign trends of patients on wards. The theme 'Management of alarms' linked to Opportunity. Nurses perceived the (false) alarms generated by the system as excessive resulting in feelings of irritation and uncertainty. The theme 'Integration and compatibility with clinical workflow' linked to Opportunity. CVSM was experienced as helpful and easy to use, although integration in mobile devices and the EMR was highly favoured and the management of clinical workflows would need improvement. The theme 'Added value for nursing care' linked to Motivation. All nurses recognized the potential added value of CVSM for postoperative care.

conclusionOur findings suggest all parts of the COM-B model should be considered when implementing CVSM on general wards. When the themes in Capability and Opportunity are not properly addressed by selecting interventions and policy categories, this may negatively influence the Motivation and may compromise successful implementation.

Indexed as

Behaviour Change WheelContinuous vital sign monitoringImplementationMonitoring, Physiological (MeSH)NursesTelemedicine (MeSH)TelemonitoringVital signs (MeSH)Wearable devices

Identifiers

PMID35287678
PMCPMC8919550
OpenAlexW4220855073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.