Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35287675›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

"The real pandemic's been there forever": qualitative perspectives of domestic and family violence workforce in Australia during COVID-19.

Rachel Baffsky, Kristen Beek, Sarah Wayland, Janani Shanthosh, Amanda Henry, Patricia Cullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel BaffskySchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Samuels Building, F25, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Kristen BeekSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Samuels Building, F25, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Sarah WaylandFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Sydney Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Janani ShanthoshThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, 1 King Street Newtown NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Amanda HenryThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, 1 King Street Newtown NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Patricia CullenSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Samuels Building, F25, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington NSW, Sydney, Australia. patricia.cullen@unsw.edu.au.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1134894National Health and Medical Research Council 1158223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2020, Australia, like most countries, introduced restrictions related to the global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Frontline services in the domestic and family violence (DFV) sector had to adapt and innovate to continue supporting clients who were experiencing and/or at risk of DFV. There is a need to understand from the perspective of those on the frontline how DFV service responses in different contexts impacted their working conditions and subsequent wellbeing, and what they want to see continued in 'the new normal' to inform future effective practices. We address this by reporting on findings from in-depth interviews conducted with practitioners and managers from the DFV sector in Australia.

methodsBetween July and September 2020 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 51 DFV practitioners and managers from a range of services and specialisations across legal, housing, health and social care services. The data was analysed using iterative thematic analysis.

resultsThe most common service adaptations reported were shifting to outreach models of care, introducing infection control procedures and adopting telehealth/digital service delivery. Adjacent to these changes, participants described how these adaptations created implementation challenges including increased workload, maintaining quality and safety, and rising costs. Impacts on practitioners were largely attributed to the shift towards remote working with a collision in their work and home life and increased risk of vicarious trauma. Despite these challenges, most expressed a sense of achievement in how their service was responding to COVID-19, with several adaptations that practitioners and managers wanted to see continued in 'the new normal', including flexible working and wellbeing initiatives.

conclusionsThe pandemic has amplified existing challenges for those experiencing DFV as well as those working on the frontline of DFV. Our findings point to the diversity in workforce experiences and has elucidated valuable lessons to shape future service delivery. Given the continuing impacts of the pandemic on DFV, this study provides timely insight and impetus to strengthen the implementation of remote working and telehealth/digital support across the DFV sector and to inform better supports for DFV workforce wellbeing in Australia and other contexts.

trial registrationNot a clinical intervention.

Indexed as

COVID-19Domestic ViolenceAustraliaHumansPandemicsWorkforceAbuseCOVID-19Domestic violenceFamily violenceIntimate partner violenceWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID35287675
PMCPMC8920801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.