ArticleBMC palliative care2022
General population-based study on preferences towards end-of-life care in Southern Thailand: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of End-of-Life Care in the Community in the Asian Context: A Systematic Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingPooled it
- Factors associated with dying in hospital awaiting palliative care admission: a retrospective cohort study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Do Socioeconomic Factors Influence Knowledge, Attitudes, and Representations of End-of-Life Practices? A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of palliative care · 2025Article
- Understanding attitudes and preferences towards advance care planning in older adults: Insights from a cross-sectional study in primary care.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Individual characteristics influencing the general population's level of knowledge of end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- What do physicians want at the end? An international qualitative study on physicians' personal end-of-life preferences and what influences them.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Differences in trends in discharge location in a cohort of hospitalized patients with cancer and non-cancer diagnoses receiving specialist palliative care: A retrospective cohort study.Palliative medicine · 2023Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of depressive symptoms among patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy in southern Thailand: a university hospital-based cross-sectional study.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Preferred Place of End-of-Life Care Based on Clinical Scenario: A Cross-Sectional Study of a General Japanese Population.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The relationship between futile medical care and respect for patient dignity: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnd-of-life care preferences are potentially due to individual choice and feature variation due to culture and beliefs. This study aims to examine end-of-life care preferences and any associated factors, among the general Thai population. This could inform physicians in regards to how to optimize the quality of life for patients that are near the end of their lives.
methodsA cross-sectional study surveyed the general population in the Thai province of Songkhla; from January to April 2021. The questionnaires inquired about: 1) demographic information, 2) experiences with end-of-life care for their relatives, and 3) end-of-life care preferences. To determine end-of-life preferences, the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The data concerning patient demographics and end-of-life care preferences were compared using Fisher's exact test.
resultsThe majority of the 1037 participants (67.6%) were female. The mean age among the adult and older adult groups were 40.9 ± 12.2, 70.0 ± 5.1, respectively. Half of them (48%) had an experience of observing someone die and 58% were satisfied with the care that their relatives had received. Most participants identified the following major end-of-life care preferences: having loved ones around (98.1%), being free from distressing symptoms (95.8%), receiving the full truth (95.0%), and having meaning in their lives (95.0%). There were no statistically significant differences in regards to end-of-life care preferences apart from being involved in treatment decisions, between adult and older adult groups.
conclusionThere was only one difference between the end-of-life preferences of the adult group versus the older adult group in regards to the topic of patient involvement in treatment decisions. Furthermore, receiving the full truth regarding their illness, being free from distressing symptoms, having loved ones around, and living with a sense of meaning were important end-of-life care preferences for both groups. Therefore, these should be taken into account when developing strategies towards improving patient life quality during their end-of-life period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.