Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35287332›Full record

ReviewHealth sciences review (Oxford, England)2022

Changes in hospital admissions and complications of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ugo Grossi, Gaetano Gallo, Monica Ortenzi, Marco Piccino, Nick Salimian, Mario Guerrieri, Giuseppe Sammarco, Carla Felice, Giulio Aniello Santoro, Salomone Di Saverio and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health sciences review (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ugo GrossiII Surgery Unit, Treviso Regional Hospital, DISCOG, University of Padua, Italy.
Gaetano GalloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Monica OrtenziDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Marco PiccinoII Surgery Unit, Treviso Regional Hospital, DISCOG, University of Padua, Italy.
Nick SalimianII Surgery Unit, Treviso Regional Hospital, DISCOG, University of Padua, Italy.
Mario GuerrieriDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Giuseppe SammarcoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Carla FeliceI Medicine Unit, Treviso Regional Hospital, DIMED, University of Padua, Italy.
Giulio Aniello SantoroII Surgery Unit, Treviso Regional Hospital, DISCOG, University of Padua, Italy.
Salomone Di SaverioDepartment of General Surgery, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Gian Luca Di TannaThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia.
Giacomo ZanusII Surgery Unit, Treviso Regional Hospital, DISCOG, University of Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common emergencies in general surgery worldwide. During the pandemic, a significant decrease in the number of accesses to the emergency department for AA has been recorded in different countries. A systematic review of the current literature sought to determine the impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on hospital admissions and complications of AA. Method: A systematic search was undertaken to identify repeated cross-sectional studies reporting the management of AA during the COVID-19 pandemic (index period) as compared to the previous year, or at the turn of lockdown (reference period). Data were abstracted on article (country of origin) and patients characteristics (adults, children [i.e. non adults, <18-year-old]), or mixed population) within the two given timeframes, including demographics, number of admissions for AA, number of appendectomies, and complicated appendectomies Results: Of 201 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 54 studies from 22 world countries were included. In total, 27 (50%) were conducted on adults, 12 (22%) on children, and 15 (28%) on a mixed patients population. The overall rate ratio of admissions for AA between the two periods was 0.94 (95%CI, 0.75-1.17), with significant differences between studies on adults (0.90 [0.74-1.09]), mixed population (0.50 [0.27-0.90]), and children (1.50 [1.01-2.22]). The overall risk ratio of complicated AA was 1.65 (1.32-2.07), ranging from 1.32 in studies on children, to 2.45 in mixed population. Conclusion: The pandemic has altered the rate of admissions for AA and appendectomy, with parallel increased incidence of complicated cases in all age groups.

Indexed as

Acute appendicitisAppendectomyCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35287332
PMCPMC8906891
OpenAlexW4220842063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.