Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35287265›Full record

ArticleEthik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin2022

[COVID-19 protective measures in nursing homes: Between autonomy and care - Results of an interview study].

Magdalena Flatscher-Thöni, Elisabeth Holzer, Martin Pallauf, Christiane Kreyer

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Ethik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Magdalena Flatscher-ThöniInstitut für Public Health, Medical Decision Making und HTA, Department für Public Health, Versorgungsforschung und HTA, UMIT Tirol, Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, EWZ I, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Österreich.
Elisabeth HolzerInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, Department für Pflegewissenschaft und Gerontologie, UMIT Tirol, Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Hall in Tirol, Österreich.
Martin PallaufInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft und -praxis, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Salzburg, Österreich.
Christiane KreyerInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, Department für Pflegewissenschaft und Gerontologie, UMIT Tirol, Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Hall in Tirol, Österreich.
UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik · ATParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Definition of the problem: This interview study investigated ethical issues in long-term care facilities from the perspective of caregivers during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Due to the explorative as well as descriptive methodological approach, interview data are available and can be assigned to four central topics, which reveal a complex and sometimes conflictual reality of work and life in long-term care during the pandemic. On the one hand, the protective measures taken by the state and the institutions, as well as the resulting restrictions on the personal freedom of the residents are critically reflected and the degree of self-determination of the residents of nursing homes in the pandemic is questioned. On the other hand - given the pandemic-related measures - nursing activities in long-term care facilities as a place of work and life are described as challenging, especially regarding the changed nursing processes and quality of care, as well as due to the changed quality of relationships with the residents. Arguments: These four topics can basically be assigned to the ethical principles of autonomy and care and present a relevant concretization of the principle-oriented ethical challenges in long-term care during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the synopsis and interpretation of the results, it becomes apparent that the interviewed caregivers closely link the observance and implementation of the autonomy principle in everyday nursing care with the principle of care and the resulting well-being of the residents. Conclusions: Our results clearly show that the paradigm shift in long-term care, which has been developed over the last few decades, was (temporarily massively) weakened by the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the reported moral uncertainties and conflicts make it clear that caregivers need support regarding the ethical reflection of their nursing actions and that a sustainable integration of ethics counselling in long-term care facilities may be a possible approach to a solution.

Indexed as

Autonomy and careCare giversCOVID-19 pandemicEthical issues and challengesLong-term care

Identifiers

PMID35287265
PMCPMC8908748
OpenAlexW4221084042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.