ArticleAdvances in therapy2022
Efficacy and Safety of Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% Ophthalmic Solution: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data in Japan.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and Safety of Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% Ophthalmic Solution in Treatment-Naive Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Prospective Multicenter Phase IV Study.Journal of glaucoma · 2025Trial
- The role of prostanoids in the retina and optic nerve in health and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- Steroid-Induced Ocular Hypertension in Mice Is Differentially Reduced by Selective EP2, EP3, EP4, and IP Prostanoid Receptor Agonists.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Recently Approved Drugs for Lowering and Controlling Intraocular Pressure to Reduce Vision Loss in Ocular Hypertensive and Glaucoma Patients.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) in a retrospective, real-world, multicenter setting.
methodsA retrospective medical chart review of patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension receiving OMDI from November 2018 to November 2019 with at least 12 weeks of follow-up was conducted in 11 eye clinics in Japan. The participants were categorized into three therapy groups, designated the naïve monotherapy, switching monotherapy, and concomitant therapy groups. The main outcome measures were the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at week 4 and week 12 after the initiation of OMDI treatment, and frequency of adverse drug reactions.
resultsData were collected from 827 patients. The baseline IOP in the naïve group was 16.6 ± 4.2 mmHg. The mean IOP reduction at week 4 and week 12 was - 2.9 ± 3.2 mmHg (P < 0.0001) and - 2.5 ± 2.9 mmHg (P < 0.0001), respectively. Eyes with baseline IOP less than 16 mmHg also showed a significant reduction of IOP of - 1.4 ± 2.0 mmHg at week 12. OMDI significantly reduced IOP not only in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma but also in eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma and secondary glaucoma. In the switching monotherapy group, IOP did not change significantly after switching from most classes of medications to OMDI, but further IOP reduction was observed in the case of switching from beta-blockers to OMDI. The frequency of adverse drug reactions was 14.1% in all participants, and the most common adverse reaction was ocular hyperemia (7.6%). No serious and severe side effects were observed in this study.
conclusionOMDI showed an IOP-lowering effect in eyes with various types of glaucoma and using various therapeutic regimens in real-world clinical practice. In addition, OMDI did not show any serious and severe side effects, suggesting the potential of OMDI as a first-line medicine for the treatment of glaucoma.
trial registrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN): 000040040.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.