Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35287207›Full record

ReviewAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2022

Recent progress in the development of improved reference electrodes for electrochemistry.

Blair K Troudt, Celeste R Rousseau, Xin I N Dong, Evan L Anderson, Philippe Bühlmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
  12. Electrochemical analysis based on bioaffinity.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Blair K TroudtDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Celeste R RousseauDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Xin I N DongDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Evan L AndersonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Philippe BühlmannDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. buhlmann@umn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vital part of almost every experimental electrochemical set up is the reference electrode. As the development of working and indicator electrodes progresses to sensors with greater long-term stability and efficiency, it is important for reference electrodes to keep up with that progress. In this review, the deficiencies of commonly used reference electrodes are discussed, and recent work in the development of new reference electrode designs for more stable and reliable electrochemical experiments is highlighted. This encompasses work with salt-bridge reference electrodes comprising nanoporous and capillary junctions, solid-contact reference electrodes, and ionic liquid-based reference electrodes.

Indexed as

Ionic LiquidsNanoporesElectrochemistryElectrodesIonic LiquidsIonic liquid reference electrodesLiquid junctionReference electrodesSalt bridgesSolid-contact reference electrodes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.