ReviewAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2022
Recent advances in nephropathy biomarker detections using paper-based analytical devices.
Review in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nephropathy or kidney disease involves the deterioration of kidney functions, causing severe diseases, such as proteinuria, chronic kidney diseases, and kidney failure. Currently, nephropathy that develops into kidney failure is increasing globally, as indicated by the increasing number of patients undergoing hemodialysis. Some developed analytical methods for nephropathy using albumin, creatinine, uric acid, and the urinary albumin-to-creatine ratio biomarkers, including spectrophotometry, turbidimetric immunoassay, and ELISA, have been reported so far, providing good accuracy and precision. However, WHO has established guidelines for developing diagnostic tools that meet several criteria: Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and Robust, Equipment-free, Delivered to those who need it. This means that nephropathy detection can be carried out using a simple method compatible with point-of-care that allows independent urine analysis by patients. For this purpose, the use of paper-based analytical devices (PADs) as an alternative platform for the detection of albumin, creatinine, uric acid, and the urinary albumin-to-creatine ratio were reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.