ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2022
Developmental changes in how children generalize from their experience to support predictive linguistic processing.
Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Prediction is posited to support fluent comprehension of speech-but how and when do young listeners, who encounter unfamiliar and novel events with high frequency, learn to deploy predictive processing strategies in these unfamiliar circumstances? The current work used a discourse-based event teaching paradigm to explore how English-speaking school-aged children (aged 5;0-8;11 [years;months]; N = 92) generalize from their (experimentally controlled) experience to generate real-time linguistic predictions about novel events during an eye-tracked sentence recognition task. The findings reveal developmental differences in how the initial structure of event exposure supports generalization. Specifically, real-time extension was supported by viewing multiple instances of events involving varied agents in the younger children (5-6 years), whereas older children (7-8 years) extended when they experienced repetition of events with identical agents. The findings support accounts of predictive processing suggesting that learners generate predictions in a variety of less predictable circumstances and suggest practical directions to support early learning and language processing skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.