Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2022
Efficacy and safety of CD24Fc in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04317040 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-site, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CD24Fc in COVID-19 Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-site, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CD24Fc in COVID-19 Treatment
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Realizing the potential of agonistic antibody immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Radiation-Enhanced CD24 Membrane Trafficking via GPI Anchoring Mediates Antitumor Immune Evasion.Cancer research · 2026Article
- CD24-Fc resolves inflammation and enhances anti-HIV CD8 T cells with polyfunctionality during HIV-1 infection under cART.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Multiple functions of HMGB1 in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- From mechanism to therapy: the journey of CD24 in cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Checkpoint CD24 function on tumor and immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Targeting CD24 as a novel immunotherapy for solid cancers.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023Review
- The KINETIC phase 2 randomized controlled trial of oral pamapimod-pioglitazone in non-critically ill COVID-19 inpatients.iScience · 2023Article
- Myofiber Baf60c controls muscle regeneration by modulating Dkk3-mediated paracrine signaling.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2023Article
- Stocking the toolbox-Using preclinical models to understand the development and treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events.Immunological reviews · 2023Review
- Predicting the severity of COVID-19 patients using the CD24-CSF1R index in whole blood samples.Heliyon · 2023Article
- A Clinical Update on SARS-CoV-2: Pathology and Development of Potential Inhibitors.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- The biological roles of CD24 in ovarian cancer: old story, but new tales.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- CD24-Siglec interactions in inflammatory diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Effect of extracorporeal hemoadsorption in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- New hope for tumor immunotherapy: the macrophage-related "do not eat me" signaling pathway.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- CD24-Fc suppression of immune related adverse events in a therapeutic cancer vaccine model of murine neuroblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- A soluble DR5-Fc chimeric protein attenuates inflammatory responses induced by coronavirus MHV-A59 and SARS-CoV-2.Journal of medical virology · 2022Article
- Insights into CD24 and Exosome Physiology and Potential Role in View of Recent Advances in COVID-19 Therapeutics: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-antiviral therapeutic options are required for the treatment of hospitalised patients with COVID-19. CD24Fc is an immunomodulator with potential to reduce the exaggerated inflammatory response to tissue injuries. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CD24Fc in hospitalised adults with COVID-19 receiving oxygen support.
methodsWe conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study at nine medical centres in the USA. Hospitalised patients (age ≥18 years) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were receiving oxygen support and standard of care were randomly assigned (1:1) by site-stratified block randomisation to receive a single intravenous infusion of CD24Fc 480 mg or placebo. The study funder, investigators, and patients were masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement over 28 days, defined as time that elapsed between a baseline National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ordinal scale score of 2-4 and reaching a score of 5 or higher or hospital discharge. The prespecified primary interim analysis was done when 146 participants reached the time to clinical improvement endpoint. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04317040.
findingsBetween April 24 and Sept 22, 2020, 243 hospitalised patients were assessed for eligibility and 234 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive CD24Fc (n=116) or placebo (n=118). The prespecified interim analysis was done when 146 participants reached the time to clinical improvement endpoint among 197 randomised participants. In the interim analysis, the 28-day clinical improvement rate was 82% (81 of 99) for CD24Fc versus 66% (65 of 98) for placebo; median time to clinical improvement was 6·0 days (95% CI 5·0-8·0) in the CD24Fc group versus 10·0 days (7·0-15·0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·61, 95% CI 1·16-2·23; log-rank p=0·0028, which crossed the prespecified efficacy boundary [α=0·0147]). 37 participants were randomly assigned after the interim analysis data cutoff date; among the 234 randomised participants, median time to clinical improvement was 6·0 days (95% CI 5·0-9·0) in the CD24Fc group versus 10·5 days (7·0-15·0) in the placebo group (HR 1·40, 95% CI 1·02-1·92; log-rank p=0·037). The proportion of participants with disease progression within 28 days was 19% (22 of 116) in the CD24Fc group versus 31% (36 of 118) in the placebo group (HR 0·56, 95% CI 0·33-0·95; unadjusted p=0·031). The incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in both groups. No treatment-related adverse events were observed.
interpretationCD24Fc is generally well tolerated and accelerates clinical improvement of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who are receiving oxygen support. These data suggest that targeting inflammation in response to tissue injuries might provide a therapeutic option for patients hospitalised with COVID-19.
fundingMerck & Co, National Cancer Institute, OncoImmune.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.