ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2023
Role of 16S Ribosomal RNA Analysis in Identification of Microorganisms in Febrile Urinary Tract Infection of Infants.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biofilm-Mediated Antimicrobial Resistance in PediatricAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Role of Gut and Urinary Microbiome in Children with Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in Culturomics Research on the Human Gut Microbiome: Optimizing Medium Composition and Culture Techniques for Enhanced Microbial Discovery.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the role of 16S ribosomal RNA analysis in microbial identification in febrile infants under six months of age diagnosed with UTI, and compare it with the conventional culture results.
methodsYoung infants under 6 mo of age who were suspected UTI from May 2018 to April 2019 had been enrolled. Uropathogens were analyzed by the traditional microbiologic culture system and the 16S rRNA analysis. The 16S rRNA analysis included 16S rRNA amplicon band confirmation and bacterial identification through the sequencing analysis.
resultsA total of 57 infants with the febrile UTI were enrolled, and the median age was 3 mo. Uropathogens were identified in 43 patients (75.4%) in a conventional culture method: Escherichia coli in 38 patients (88.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae in 3 (7.0%), Enterobacter cloacae in 1 (2.3%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 1 (2.3%). Fifty urine samples (87.8%) had positive 16S rRNA amplicon band on electrophoresis. Among the 16S rRNA-positive urines, 40 samples were available for the sequence analysis of 16S rRNA, and the identification of bacteria were as follows: E. fergusonii in 36, K. pneumoniae in 3, and Shigella flexneri in 1. The sensitivity of 16S rRNA sequencing was 81.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 67.4-90.3%] and the specificity was 64.3% (95% CI, 38.8-83.7%).
conclusionUropathogen identification using 16S rRNA analysis could be applied to manage the febrile UTI in young infants clinically in combination with the conventional culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.