Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35286478›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2022

Processing of visual statistics of naturalistic videos in macaque visual areas V1 and V4.

Gaku Hatanaka, Mikio Inagaki, Ryosuke F Takeuchi, Shinji Nishimoto, Koji Ikezoe, Ichiro Fujita

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Texture Statistics Encoding Model Reveals Hierarchical Feature Selectivity across Human Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. An implanted lennula approach to measure neural CaImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gaku HatanakaGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-8228
Mikio InagakiGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-501X
Ryosuke F TakeuchiGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-5259
Shinji NishimotoGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8015-340X
Koji IkezoeGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2736-5037
Ichiro FujitaGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. fujita@fbs.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-8610
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology · JPThe University of Osaka · JPUniversity of Yamanashi · JP

Funding

Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology JPMJER1801Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 15K18357Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JP15H01437Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JP16H01673Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JP17H01381Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JP18H05007Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JP18H0522Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JP21H02596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural scenes are characterized by diverse image statistics, including various parameters of the luminance histogram, outputs of Gabor-like filters, and pairwise correlations between the filter outputs of different positions, orientations, and scales (Portilla-Simoncelli statistics). Some of these statistics capture the response properties of visual neurons. However, it remains unclear to what extent such statistics can explain neural responses to natural scenes and how neurons that are tuned to these statistics are distributed across the cortex. Using two-photon calcium imaging and an encoding-model approach, we addressed these issues in macaque visual areas V1 and V4. For each imaged neuron, we constructed an encoding model to mimic its responses to naturalistic videos. By extracting Portilla-Simoncelli statistics through outputs of both filters and filter correlations, and by computing an optimally weighted sum of these outputs, the model successfully reproduced responses in a subpopulation of neurons. We evaluated the selectivities of these neurons by quantifying the contributions of each statistic to visual responses. Neurons whose responses were mainly determined by Gabor-like filter outputs (low-level statistics) were abundant at most imaging sites in V1. In V4, the relative contribution of higher order statistics, such as cross-scale correlation, was increased. Preferred image statistics varied markedly across V4 sites, and the response similarity of two neurons at individual imaging sites gradually declined with increasing cortical distance. The results indicate that natural scene analysis progresses from V1 to V4, and neurons sharing preferred image statistics are locally clustered in V4.

Indexed as

Visual CortexAnimalsMacaca mulattaNeuronsOrientationPhotic StimulationVisual PathwaysCalcium imagingEncoding model analysisFunctional architecturePortilla–Simoncelli statisticsPrimary visual cortexTwo-photon microscopy

Identifiers

PMID35286478
PMCPMC9046337
OpenAlexW4220658109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.