Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35286427›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2022

Predictors for long-term adherence to vaginal pessary in pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective study.

Danielle I Niigaki, Rebecca S P Silva, Maria Augusta Tezelli Bortolini, Fátima F Fitz, Rodrigo A Castro

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle I NiigakiDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 608-Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 04024-002, Brazil.
Rebecca S P SilvaDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 608-Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 04024-002, Brazil.
Maria Augusta Tezelli BortoliniDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 608-Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 04024-002, Brazil. maria.augusta@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-5320
Fátima F FitzDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 608-Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 04024-002, Brazil.
Rodrigo A CastroDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 608-Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 04024-002, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to investigate the rate of adherence to pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), to identify factors associated with long-term (longer than 1 year) use of vaginal pessaries in Brazilian women with POP and its impact on quality of life (QoL).

methodsA prospective observational study assessed 247 consecutive women candidates for a pessary to manage symptomatic POP. Patients were fitted with a ring pessary and follow-up visits were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months. Pessary complications and reasons for discontinuation were recorded. Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QoL) was applied at baseline and after 1 year of treatment. We used a logistic regression model for the analyses, with p < 0.05 for significance.

resultsA total of 236 women were included in the study, of whom 110 (46.6%) maintained the pessary treatment for longer than 12 months. The main reason for pessary discontinuation was the patient opting for surgery (50.8%). Vulvovaginitis was the main long-term complication (44.5%), followed by vaginal ulceration (16.4%) and urinary urgency (10%). No prior hysterectomy (OR = 2.26; 95% CI 1.19-4.31), vaginal estrogen use (OR = 1.94; 95% CI 1.06-3.52), and mean age (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06) were variables associated with long-term use of vaginal pessary (p < 0.05 for all). Total P-QoL score significantly changed with pessary use (519.1 at baseline and 260 after 12-month treatment, p < 0.00).

conclusionsOur study suggests that no prior hysterectomy, the local estrogen therapy, and age might be factors associated with use of a ring vaginal pessary for longer than 1 year. Long-term pessary users had a significant improvement in their quality of life.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapsePessariesEstrogensFemaleHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeEstrogensAdherenceLong-termPelvic organ prolapsePessaryPredictorRing pessary

Identifiers

PMID35286427
OpenAlexW4221120170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.