Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35286329›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Development of a dose-response model for porcine cysticercosis.

Daniel A Andrade-Mogrovejo, Eloy Gonzales-Gustavson, Ana C Ho-Palma, Joaquín M Prada, Gabrielle Bonnet, Francesco Pizzitutti, Luis A Gomez-Puerta, Gianfranco Arroyo, Seth E O'Neal, Hector H Garcia and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Research gaps and priorities for quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA).Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Modelling morbidity for neglected tropical diseases: the long and winding road from cumulative exposure to long-term pathology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Daniel A Andrade-MogrovejoDepartment of Animal and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
Eloy Gonzales-GustavsonDepartment of Animal and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-7328-2983
Ana C Ho-PalmaDepartment of Human Medicine, School of Human Medicine, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-3228-4074
Joaquín M PradaDepartment of Veterinary Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Gabrielle BonnetSchool of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3539-5001
Francesco PizzituttiSchool of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Luis A Gomez-PuertaDepartment of Animal and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
Gianfranco ArroyoCenter for Global Health Tumbes, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, San Martín de Porres, Peru.
Seth E O'NealSchool of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Hector H GarciaCenter for Global Health Tumbes, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, San Martín de Porres, Peru.
Javier GuitianVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Armando GonzalezDepartment of Animal and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
Cysticercosis Working Group in Peru

Funding

Training in Parasitic Diseases and Central Nervous System Infections in Peru.D43TW001140 · FIC · UNIVERSIDAD PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA · PI GARCIA, HECTOR HUGO, GILMAN, ROBERT H · 1999 to 2025
$5.7M
Development and validation of an agent-based model to promote evidence-based control of Taenia solium cysticercosisR01AI141554 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI O'NEAL, SETH E · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW001140Medical Research Council MR/S025049/1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI141554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taenia solium is an important cause of acquired epilepsy worldwide and remains endemic in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Transmission of this parasite is still poorly understood despite the design of infection experiments to improve our knowledge of the disease, with estimates for critical epidemiological parameters, such as the probability of human-to-pig infection after exposure to eggs, still lacking. In this paper, a systematic review was carried out and eight pig infection experiments were analyzed to describe the probability of developing cysts. These experiments included different pathways of inoculation: with ingestion of proglottids, eggs, and beetles that ingested eggs, and direct injection of activated oncospheres into the carotid artery. In these experiments, different infective doses were used, and the numbers of viable and degenerated cysts in the body and brain of each pig were registered. Five alternative dose-response models (exponential, logistic, log-logistic, and exact and approximate beta-Poisson) were assessed for their accuracy in describing the observed probabilities of cyst development as a function of the inoculation dose. Dose-response models were developed separately for the presence of three types of cysts (any, viable only, and cysts in the brain) and considered for each of the four inoculation methods ("Proglottids", "Eggs", "Beetles" and "Carotid"). The exact beta-Poisson model best fit the data for the three types of cysts and all relevant exposure pathways. However, observations for some exposure pathways were too scarce to reliably define a dose-response curve with any model. A wide enough range of doses and sufficient sample sizes was only found for the "Eggs" pathway and a merged "Oral" pathway combining the "Proglottids", "Eggs" and "Beetles" pathways. Estimated parameter values from this model suggest that a low infective dose is sufficient to result in a 50% probability for the development of any cyst or for viable cyst infections. Although this is a preliminary model reliant on a limited dataset, the parameters described in this manuscript should contribute to the design of future experimental infections related to T. solium transmission, as well as the parameterization of simulation models of transmission aimed at informing control.

Indexed as

ColeopteraCysticercosisCystsSwine DiseasesTaenia soliumAnimalsSwine

Identifiers

PMID35286329
PMCPMC8920259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.