Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35286319›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Efficacy of oral fluralaner (Bravecto) against Tunga penetrans in dogs: A negative control, randomized field study in an endemic community in Brazil.

Katharine Costa Dos Santos, Rafael Marin Chiummo, Anja Regina Heckeroth, Eva Zschiesche, Paula Elisa Brandão Guedes, Tatiani Vitor Harvey, Anderson Vieira de Jesus, Anaiá da Paixão Sevá, Joana Thaisa Santos de Oliveira, Zelina Dos Santos Freire and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Treatment of Animal Tungiasis: What's New?Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharine Costa Dos SantosUESC, State University of Santa Cruz, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8940-2548
Rafael Marin ChiummoMSD, Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Schwabenheim, Germany.
Anja Regina HeckerothMSD, Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Schwabenheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4098-6989
Eva ZschiescheMSD, Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Schwabenheim, Germany.
Paula Elisa Brandão GuedesUESC, State University of Santa Cruz, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2961-8069
Tatiani Vitor HarveyUESC, State University of Santa Cruz, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-7713
Anderson Vieira de JesusUESC, State University of Santa Cruz, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-0541
Anaiá da Paixão SeváUESC, State University of Santa Cruz, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
Joana Thaisa Santos de OliveiraUESC, State University of Santa Cruz, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0353-0731
Zelina Dos Santos FreireUFMS, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Jürgen KrückenFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Fernando de Almeida BorgesUFMS, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8888-6269
Georg von Samson-HimmelstjernaFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6043-2038
Renata Santiago Alberto CarlosUESC, State University of Santa Cruz, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil. CNPq Reseracher - PQ2.
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz · BRFreie Universität Berlin · DEUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sand flea Tunga penetrans is one of the zoonotic agents of tungiasis, a parasitic skin disease of humans and animals. The dog is one of its main reservoirs. This negatively controlled, randomized, double-masked clinical trial evaluated the therapeutic and residual efficacy of fluralaner for treatment of dogs naturally infested with T. penetrans. Sixty-two dogs from an endemically affected community in Brazil were randomly assigned to either receive oral fluralaner (Bravecto chewable tablets) at a dose of 25 to 56 mg fluralaner/kg body weight, or no treatment (31 dogs per group). Dogs were clinically examined using a severity score for acute canine tungiasis (SCADT), parasitological examinations as defined by the Fortaleza classification, and pictures of lesions on days 0 (inclusion and treatment), 7 ± 2, 14 ± 2, 21 ± 2, 28 ± 2, 60 ± 7, 90 ± 7, 120 ± 7 and 150 ± 7. The percentage of parasite-free dogs after treatment was >90% between days 14 and 90 post-treatment with 100% efficacy on study days 21, 28 and 60. Sand flea counts on fluralaner treated dogs were significantly lower (p<0.025) than control dogs on all counts from day 7 to 120. The number of live sand fleas on treated dogs was reduced by > 90% on day 7, > 95% on days 14 and 90, and 100% from day 21 to 60, and with a significant difference between groups from day 7 to 120. From day 7 to day 120, mean SCADT scores were significantly reduced in treated dogs with a mean of 0.10 compared to 1.54 on day 120 in untreated dogs. Therefore, a single oral fluralaner administration is effective for treating and achieving long lasting (> 12 weeks) prevention for tungiasis in dogs.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesInsecticidesTungiasisAnimalsBrazilDogsIsoxazolesTungaA1443 compoundInsecticidesIsoxazoles

Identifiers

PMID35286319
PMCPMC8947607
OpenAlexW4220792170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.