Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35286304›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2022

HAM-ART: An optimised culture-free Hi-C metagenomics pipeline for tracking antimicrobial resistance genes in complex microbial communities.

Lajos Kalmar, Srishti Gupta, Iain R L Kean, Xiaoliang Ba, Nazreen Hadjirin, Elizabeth M Lay, Stefan P W de Vries, Michael Bateman, Harriet Bartlet, Juan Hernandez-Garcia and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Lajos KalmarDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3691-8350
Srishti GuptaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6721-1783
Iain R L KeanDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1066-8285
Xiaoliang BaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-3585
Nazreen HadjirinDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth M LayDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Stefan P W de VriesDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0823-208X
Michael BatemanDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Harriet BartletDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7389-8785
Juan Hernandez-GarciaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5932-9327
Alexander W TuckerDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0062-0843
Olivier RestifDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9158-853X
Mark P StevensThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
James L N WoodDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0258-3188
Duncan J MaskellThe University of Melbourne, Victoria Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5065-653X
Andrew J GrantDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9746-2989
Mark A HolmesDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5454-1625

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N002660/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shotgun metagenomics is a powerful tool to identify antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes in microbiomes but has the limitation that extrachromosomal DNA, such as plasmids, cannot be linked with the host bacterial chromosome. Here we present a comprehensive laboratory and bioinformatics pipeline HAM-ART (Hi-C Assisted Metagenomics for Antimicrobial Resistance Tracking) optimised for the generation of metagenome-assembled genomes including both chromosomal and extrachromosomal AMR genes. We demonstrate the performance of the pipeline in a study comparing 100 pig faecal microbiomes from low- and high-antimicrobial use pig farms (organic and conventional farms). We found significant differences in the distribution of AMR genes between low- and high-antimicrobial use farms including a plasmid-borne lincosamide resistance gene exclusive to high-antimicrobial use farms in three species of Lactobacilli. The bioinformatics pipeline code is available at https://github.com/lkalmar/HAM-ART.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsMicrobiotaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialMetagenomicsSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID35286304
PMCPMC8947609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.