ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Deep learning tools and modeling to estimate the temporal expression of cell cycle proteins from 2D still images.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chikungunya virus replicates in the human testisEmerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- Article
- Targeted therapy for capillary-venous malformations.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Article
- Automated identification of protein expression intensity and classification of protein cellular locations in mouse brain regions from immunofluorescence images.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Differential impact of genetic deletion of TIGIT or PD-1 on melanoma-specific T-lymphocytes.Oncoimmunology · 2024Article
- A Machine Learning Workflow of Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Images to Interrogate Activator and Tolerogenic Profiles of Conventional Type 1 Dendritic Cells Infiltrating Melanomas of Disease-Free and Metastatic Patients.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Imaging developmental cell cycles.Biophysical journal · 2021Review
- A deep learning segmentation strategy that minimizes the amount of manually annotated images.F1000Research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic characterization of fluorescent labeling in intact mammalian tissues remains a challenge due to the lack of quantifying techniques capable of segregating densely packed nuclei and intricate tissue patterns. Here, we describe a powerful deep learning-based approach that couples remarkably precise nuclear segmentation with quantitation of fluorescent labeling intensity within segmented nuclei, and then apply it to the analysis of cell cycle dependent protein concentration in mouse tissues using 2D fluorescent still images. First, several existing deep learning-based methods were evaluated to accurately segment nuclei using different imaging modalities with a small training dataset. Next, we developed a deep learning-based approach to identify and measure fluorescent labels within segmented nuclei, and created an ImageJ plugin to allow for efficient manual correction of nuclear segmentation and label identification. Lastly, using fluorescence intensity as a readout for protein concentration, a three-step global estimation method was applied to the characterization of the cell cycle dependent expression of E2F proteins in the developing mouse intestine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.