Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35286209›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

A dialogue-like cell communication mechanism is conserved in filamentous ascomycete fungi and mediates interspecies interactions.

Hamzeh Haj Hammadeh, Antonio Serrano, Valentin Wernet, Natascha Stomberg, Davina Hellmeier, Martin Weichert, Ulrike Brandt, Bianca Sieg, Konstantin Kanofsky, Reinhard Hehl and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. iScience · 2024
    Article
  10. Lab on a chip · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hamzeh Haj HammadehInstitut für Genetik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8837-3615
Antonio SerranoInstitut für Genetik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5678-8023
Valentin WernetDepartment of Microbiology, Institute for Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3747-6171
Natascha StombergInstitut für Genetik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0508-4798
Davina HellmeierInstitut für Genetik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Martin WeichertInstitut für Genetik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7484-9520
Ulrike BrandtInstitut für Genetik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Bianca SiegInstitut für Genetik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Konstantin KanofskyInstitut für Genetik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1872-1503
Reinhard HehlInstitut für Genetik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1550-3394
Reinhard FischerDepartment of Microbiology, Institute for Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6704-2569
André FleißnerInstitut für Genetik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Technische Universität Braunschweig · DEKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many filamentous fungi, germinating spores cooperate by fusing into supracellular structures, which develop into the mycelial colony. In the model fungus Neurospora crassa, this social behavior is mediated by an intriguing mode of communication, in which two fusing cells take turns in signal sending and receiving. Here we show that this dialogue-like cell communication mechanism is highly conserved in distantly related fungal species and mediates interspecies interactions. In mixed populations, cells of N. crassa and the phytopathogenic gray mold Botrytis cinerea coordinate their behavior over a spatial distance and establish physical contact. Subsequent cell–cell fusion is, however, restricted to germlings of the same species, indicating that species specificity of germling fusion has evolved not on the level of the signal/receptor but at subsequent levels of the fusion process. In B. cinerea, fusion and infectious growth are mutually exclusive cellular programs. Remarkably, the presence of N. crassa can reprogram this behavior and induce fusion of the gray mold on plant surfaces, potentially weakening its pathogenic potential. In a third fungal species, the nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys flagrans, the conserved signaling mechanism mediates vegetative fusion within mycelial colonies but has also been repurposed for the formation of nematode-catching traps. In summary, this study identified the cell dialogue mechanism as a conserved complex trait and revealed that even distantly related fungi possess a common molecular language, which promotes cellular contact formation across species borders.

Indexed as

AscomycotaFungiCell CommunicationFungal ProteinsGene Transfer, HorizontalSignal TransductionFungal Proteinscell fusioncell signalingfungiinterspecies interactionpathogenicity

Identifiers

PMID35286209
PMCPMC8944665
OpenAlexW4220874673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.