Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35286136›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2022

Cost Effectiveness of Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Advanced and Metastatic Cervical Cancer in India-A Model-Based Economic Analysis.

Nidhi Gupta, Prerika Nehra, Akashdeep Singh Chauhan, Nikita Mehra, Ashish Singh, Manjunath Nookala Krishnamurthy, Kavitha Rajsekhar, Jayachandran Perumal Kalaiyarasi, Partha Sarathi Roy, Prabhat Singh Malik and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab for cerebral radiation necrosis treatment based on real-world utility value in China.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Nidhi GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4079-2631
Prerika NehraDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Akashdeep Singh ChauhanDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Nikita MehraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Adyar Cancer Institute, Chennai, India.
Ashish SinghDepartment of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0981-4751
Manjunath Nookala KrishnamurthyDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9187-842X
Kavitha RajsekharDepartment of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India.
Jayachandran Perumal KalaiyarasiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Adyar Cancer Institute, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9776-6920
Partha Sarathi RoyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr B. Booroah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, India.
Prabhat Singh MalikDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0205-8559
Anisha MathewDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Pankaj MalhotraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1198-8491
Amal Chandra KatakiDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Dr B. Booroah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, India.
Jyoti DixitDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7942-1796
Sudeep GuptaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6742-6378
Lalit KumarDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Shankar PrinjaDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7719-6986
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INBhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute · INCancer Institute (WIA) · INTata Memorial Hospital · INChristian Medical College, Vellore · INGovernment Medical College and Hospital · INMinistry of Health and Family Welfare · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer have a poor prognosis with a 1-year survival rate of 10%-15%. Recently, an antiangiogenic humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab has shown to improve the survival of these patients. This study was designed to assess the cost effectiveness of incorporating bevacizumab with standard chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer in India.

methodsUsing a disaggregated societal perspective and lifetime horizon, a Markov model was developed for estimating the costs and health outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer treated with either standard chemotherapy alone or in combination with bevacizumab. Effectiveness data for each of the treatment regimen were assessed using estimates from Gynecologic Oncology Group 240 trial. Data on disease-specific mortality in metastatic cervical cancer, health system cost, and out-of-pocket expenditure were derived from Indian literature. Multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analysis was undertaken to account for parameter uncertainty.

resultsOver the lifetime of one patient with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer, bevacizumab along with standard chemotherapy results in a gain of 0.275 (0.052-0.469) life-years (LY) and 0.129 (0.032-0.218) quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), at an additional cost of $3,816 US dollars (USD; 2,513-5,571) compared with standard chemotherapy alone. This resulted in an incremental cost of $19,080 USD (7,230-52,434) per LY gained and $34,744 USD (15,782-94,914) per QALY gained with the use of bevacizumab plus standard chemotherapy.

conclusionAddition of bevacizumab to the standard chemotherapy is not cost effective for the treatment of advanced and metastatic cervical cancer in India at a threshold of 1-time per-capita gross domestic product.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsBevacizumab

Identifiers

PMID35286136
PMCPMC8932481
OpenAlexW4220695300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.