Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35286123›Full record

SynthesisPsychological services2022

Psychosis-like experiences and resilience: A systematic and critical review of the literature.

Joseph S DeLuca, Pamela Rakhshan Rouhakhtar, Mallory J Klaunig, LeeAnn Akouri-Shan, Samantha Y Jay, Therese L Todd, Cansu Sarac, Nicole D Andorko, Shaynna N Herrera, Matthew F Dobbs and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological services, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Synergistic pathways to psychosis: understanding developmental risk and resilience factors.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Joseph S DeLucaDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0002-5958-7219
Pamela Rakhshan RouhakhtarDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0001-8008-3552
Mallory J KlaunigDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-9271-3547
LeeAnn Akouri-ShanDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0001-5485-5061
Samantha Y JayDepartment of Psychology.
Therese L ToddDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0002-1021-290X
Cansu SaracDepartment of Psychiatry.
Nicole D AndorkoDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-1828-6735
Shaynna N HerreraDepartment of Psychiatry.
Matthew F DobbsDepartment of Psychiatry.
Zarina R BilgramiDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0002-5996-415X
Emily KlineDepartment of Psychiatry.
Anne BrodskyDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0001-7731-505X
Rachel JespersenDepartment of Psychiatry.
Yulia LandaDepartment of Psychiatry.
Cheryl CorcoranDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0002-8902-4353
Jason SchiffmanDepartment of Psychology.

Funding

Training the next generation of clinical neuroscientistsT32MH122394 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Rene S. Kahn, ANTONIA S NEW · 2020 to 2026
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH122394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resilience research has documented the ability to cope with traumatic and stressful situations and/or retain functioning given certain risk factors in the context of psychosis. In this study, we conducted the first systematic review of the literature on psychosis-like experiences (PLEs) and resilience. Fifteen articles (from 11 unique study samples) from 10 countries were included in this systematic review, with a total of 11,937 unique study participants. Inclusion criteria were broad, capturing a wide range of individuals with PLEs who have not yet experienced threshold psychosis, such as individuals in the general population with elevated self-reports of PLEs, as well as clinical groups diagnosed by clinician interviews (i.e., clinical- or ultra-high-risk for psychosis [CHR or UHR]). For this review, studies needed to include research aims and empirical research related to resilience, and use an established or author-defined measure of psychological and/or social resilience. Data reporting quality was assessed with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and place of residence, race/ethnicity/culture/language, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status, social capital (PROGRESS) guidelines. Study aims and measurement of key variables varied widely, and all studies were cross-sectional. In 73% of the studies, resilience was inversely associated with PLEs or psychosis risk status (e.g., CHR or UHR). Results related to specific resilience subscales were mixed. Author-defined resilience was typically related to internal/psychological resources. Future research, particularly longitudinal research involving multidimensional measurement of resilience (e.g., internal and external factors), along with well-defined theoretical models, are necessary before drawing firm conclusions on resilience and PLEs. We propose a dynamic, multifaceted, developmentally appropriate, and culturally sensitive model of resilience for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersAdaptation, PsychologicalEthnicityHumansObservational Studies as TopicRisk FactorsSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID35286123
PMCPMC10141510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.