Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35285807›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2022

Telehealth Services for Substance Use Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Assessment of Intensive Outpatient Programming and Data Collection Practices.

Kate Gliske, Justine W Welsh, Jacqueline E Braughton, Lance A Waller, Quyen M Ngo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kate GliskeButler Center for Research, Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, Center City, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-3624
Justine W WelshDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Services, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6418-744X
Jacqueline E BraughtonButler Center for Research, Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, Center City, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9893-2564
Lance A WallerDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-8886
Quyen M NgoButler Center for Research, Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, Center City, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9781-4291
Ford Foundation · USEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe onset of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the rapid transition of many types of substance use disorder (SUD) treatments to telehealth formats, despite limited information about what makes treatment effective in this novel format.

objectiveThis study aims to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of virtual intensive outpatient programming (IOP) treatment for SUD in the context of a global pandemic, while considering the unique challenges posed to data collection during an unprecedented public health crisis.

methodsThe study is based on a longitudinal study with a baseline sample of 3642 patients who enrolled in intensive outpatient addiction treatment (in-person, hybrid, or virtual care) from January 2020 to March 2021 at a large substance use treatment center in the United States. The analytical sample consisted of patients who completed the 3-month postdischarge outcome survey as part of routine outcome monitoring (n=1060, 29.1% response rate).

resultsNo significant differences were detected by delivery format in continuous abstinence (χ

conclusionsVirtual outpatient care for the treatment of SUD is a feasible alternative to in-person-only programming, leading to similar self-reported outcomes at 3 months postdischarge. Given the many obstacles presented throughout data collection during a pandemic, further research is needed to better understand under what conditions telehealth is an acceptable alternative to in-person care.

Indexed as

addictionaddiction treatmentCOVID-19digital healthfeasibility studymental healthoutpatient programpatient outcomesroutine outcome monitoring datasubstance use disordersubstance use treatmenttelehealthtelemedicinevirtual carevirtual health

Identifiers

PMID35285807
PMCPMC8923149
OpenAlexW4220868255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.