Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35285737›Full record

Observational studyInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2023

Proximal balloon-guided catheter with flow inversion vs. distal filter protection during the carotid stent placement, a seven years experience in a Colombian reference center.

O Garcia-Ledesma, D Mantilla, P A Correa-Ruiz, D D Vera, C Valenzuela-Santos, S Serrano-Gómez, A Reyes, M Galvis, C A Ferreira-Prada, O Vargas

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

O Garcia-LedesmaInterventional radiology Department. Fundación oftalmológica de Santander - Clínica Ardila Lülle. Floridablanca, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7370-4039
D MantillaInterventional radiology Department. Fundación oftalmológica de Santander - Clínica Ardila Lülle. Floridablanca, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-5727-3195
P A Correa-RuizUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga. Bucaramanga, Colombia.
D D VeraUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga. Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4901-7490
C Valenzuela-SantosRadiology Department. Fundación oftalmológica de Santander - Clínica Ardila Lülle. Floridablanca, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-5087
S Serrano-GómezClinical Research Group-UNAB, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6418-7116
A ReyesClinical Research Group-UNAB, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9852-9345
M GalvisInterventional radiology Department. Fundación oftalmológica de Santander - Clínica Ardila Lülle. Floridablanca, Colombia.
C A Ferreira-PradaInterventional radiology Department. Fundación oftalmológica de Santander - Clínica Ardila Lülle. Floridablanca, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7068-356X
O VargasInterventional radiology Department. Fundación oftalmológica de Santander - Clínica Ardila Lülle. Floridablanca, Colombia.
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga · COFoscal Hospital · COFundación Valle del Lili · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe carotid stent placement as a therapeutic option for carotid stenosis has been increasing among years; therefore, studies are required to evaluate the security and efficacy of its materials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distal filter and the proximal balloon-guided catheter with flow inversion as protection devices during carotid angioplasty and stenting.

methodsThis is a retrospective, observational study of patients diagnosed with carotid stenosis treated with angioplasty between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2020; we analyzed a radiology service database to compare the distal filter and the proximal balloon-guided catheter as protection devices during angioplasty.

resultsOne hundred seventy-five angioplasties were performed, the distal filter was the most prevalent embolic protection device used (66%), patients baseline characteristics did not differ between groups with different embolic protection devices, except for history of dyslipidemia (

conclusionsIn our study the proximal balloon-guided catheter and the distal filter protection device as protection devices during the carotid stenting didn't show significant differences regarding complications related to the system.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, BalloonCarotid StenosisCathetersColombiaHumansStentsTreatment Outcomecarotid artery diseasescarotid stenosisembolic protection devicesendovascular proceduresstroke

Identifiers

PMID35285737
PMCPMC10369106
OpenAlexW4221045884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.