Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35285707›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2022

Function and Application of the CRISPR-Cas System in the Plant Pathogen

Michael Parcey, Steven Gayder, Alan J Castle, Antonet M Svircev

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael ParceyCentre for Biotechnology, Brock Universitygrid.411793.9, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6221-6243
Steven GayderCentre for Biotechnology, Brock Universitygrid.411793.9, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2424-4811
Alan J CastleDepartment of Biological Sciences, Brock Universitygrid.411793.9, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Antonet M SvircevAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Vineland Station, Ontario, Canada.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CABrock University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage-based biocontrol is an emerging method for managing the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora. Control of E. amylovora in North America is achieved chiefly through the application of streptomycin and has led to the development of streptomycin resistance. Resistant E. amylovora can be tracked through the analysis of CRISPR spacer sequences. An alternative to antibiotics are bacterial viruses, known as phages, which lyse their hosts during replication to control the bacterial population. Endogenous CRISPR-Cas systems act as phage resistance mechanisms however, preliminary genomic analysis suggests this activity is limited in E. amylovora. This leaves the functionality of the CRISPR-Cas system, any clade-based differences, and the impact which this system may have on phage-based biocontrol in question. In this study, the CRISPR arrays from 127 newly available genomic sequences of E. amylovora were analyzed through a novel bioinformatic pipeline. Through this, the Eastern and Western North American clades were shown to be incompatible with the current PCR-based approaches for tracking E. amylovora given the size and composition of their CRISPR arrays. Two artificial CRISPR arrays were designed to investigate the functionality of the CRISPR-Cas system in E. amylovora. This system was capable of curing a targeted plasmid and providing phage resistance but was not the source of phage resistance observed within the controls. This suggests that while the CRISPR-Cas system is an important defense mechanism for invasive plasmids, an as yet unidentified mechanism is the primary source of phage resistance in E. amylovora.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesErwinia amylovoraCRISPR-Cas SystemsPlasmidsStreptomycinStreptomycinantibiotic resistancebacteriophage therapyCRISPR-Casphage biocontrolphage resistanceplant pathogens

Identifiers

PMID35285707
PMCPMC9004355
OpenAlexW4220901795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.