Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35285596›Full record

ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2022

Oral Cancer Awareness, Attitudes, and Barriers among Jordanian Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.

Fadi S Jarab, Walid Al-Qerem, Raghda Qarqaz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fadi S Jarab
Walid Al-Qerem
Raghda Qarqaz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify the gaps in the Jordanian population's knowledge about oral cancer, screening and attitudes toward screening, in addition to determining the barriers to oral cancer screening. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional web-based study was conducted. The first section of the questionnaire employed collected the participants' sociodemographic data. A question about whether patients had heard about oral cancer was then included, and those who answered 'no' were instructed to submit the questionnaire. The subsequent parts evaluated the participants' knowledge of oral cancer and screening, attitudes toward screening, and barriers against screening. ANOVA and chi-squared tests were conducted to investigate the sample characteristics associated with the participants' unfamiliarity with oral cancer. Binary regression was conducted to predict the variables associated with the participants' knowledge and attitudes.

resultsThe questionnaire was filled by 1307 participants (1011 females). Most of the participants (70.01%) stated that they had heard of oral cancer, and the variables associated with awareness of oral were sex, monthly income, health insurance coverage, working status, and educational level. Sources of information and age were significantly associated with knowledge and attitude levels. The most 'agree/strongly agree' responses about barriers were lack of knowledge and lack of awareness.

conclusionThe study participants had moderate knowledge about oral cancer and satisfactory attitudes toward screening. Nearly all barriers to screening can be overcome by the joint efforts of healthcare providers and health authorities.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMouth NeoplasmsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesattitudesbarriersJordanknowledgeoral cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID35285596
PMCPMC11641289
OpenAlexW4220919558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.