Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35285573›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2022

Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.

Sarah K Schellhammer, Brittany C Hudson, Jordan O Cox, Tracey Dawson Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah K SchellhammerDepartment of Forensic Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Brittany C HudsonDepartment of Forensic Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1526-0537
Jordan O CoxDepartment of Forensic Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4483-9185
Tracey Dawson GreenDepartment of Forensic Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4761-6657

Funding

National Institute of Justice 2016-NE-BX-0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of sexual assault cases and increasingly sensitive DNA analysis methods have resulted in sexual assault kit backlogs in the United States. Although traditional DNA extraction and purification utilizing detergents, proteinase K, and DTT have been the primary technique for lysing sperm cell fractions from these samples, it is labor-intensive and inefficient regarding time and sperm DNA recovery - hindering the ability of forensic analysts to keep pace with evidence submissions. Thus, this study examined seven alternative sperm cell lysis techniques to develop a method that could efficiently lyse sperm and consistently generate high-quality profiles while also reducing time, labor, and cost requirements. Microscopic examination of lysates indicated only Casework Direct and alkaline techniques could lyse all spermatozoa within samples, while quantification results demonstrated all methods performed comparably to the control method of forensicGEM™ Sperm (p > 0.06). Amplification with 0.25 ng DNA revealed that unpurified lysates from Casework Direct, alkaline, and NP-40 techniques produced DNA profiles with acceptable mean STR peak heights and interlocus balance, both of which were similar to or better than the control. Overall, this study demonstrated the ability of Casework Direct, alkaline, and NP-40 methods to efficiently lyse spermatozoa and provide high-quality STR profiles despite the absence of a purification step. Ultimately, based on the data reported herein, alkaline lysis is the recommended alternative sperm lysis approach given its ability to generate high-quality profiles, save time, and decrease the cost per reaction when compared to traditional sperm cell lysis methods.

Indexed as

SemenSex OffensesDNADNA FingerprintingHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsSpecimen HandlingSpermatozoaDNAalkalinecell lysisdifferential lysisdirect amplificationforensic geneticssexual assaultspermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID35285573
PMCPMC9314082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.