ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2023
'It enables the carers to see the person first': Qualitative evaluation of point-of-care digital management system in residential aged care.
Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Care quality and safety in long-term aged care settings: A systematic review and narrative analysis of missed care measurements.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Pooled it
- Participation in the digital transformation of healthcare: a review of qualitative studies.International journal of health care quality assurance · 2024Pooled it
- Aspiration pneumonia in nursing literature-a mapping review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Registered Nurse-Led Assessments in Australian Residential Aged Care Homes: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Use of a digital application to enhance communication and triage between care homes and national health service community services in the United Kingdom: a qualitative evaluation.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Developing a comprehensive model of home-based long-term care for older people in Iran: a multi-method study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Best Practices for Implementing Electronic Care Records in Adult Social Care: Rapid Scoping Review.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Using co-design to understand consumer's health information-seeking behaviours and design preferences for a new digital clinical dashboard in aged care.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review.JMIR aging · 2023Review
- 'It enables the carers to see the person first': Qualitative evaluation of point-of-care digital management system in residential aged care.Journal of clinical nursing · 2023Article
- Improving InterRAI care processes in long-term care homes: A constructivist grounded theory.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesTo evaluate acceptability, efficiency, and quality of a new digital care management system in a residential aged care home (RACH).
backgroundImproving care quality and efficiency in RACH, while simultaneously upgrading data management, is a priority for communities and governments.
designParticipatory action research with mixed methods data collection was employed to evaluate a digital care management system implemented at a 169-bed RACH. This paper reports qualitative findings of the 2-year evaluation.
methodsQualitative data were collected using focus groups with residents, visitors, nurses, managers, care workers, and consultants; resident/visitor and staff hallway interviews and responses to open-ended questions in online staff surveys. Data were analysed thematically under the four predetermined study objectives. Reporting adhered to COREQ guidelines.
results325 data captures from 88 participants, over seven data sources were coded. Findings indicate that the system was acceptable to both residents and staff due to perceptions of time-saving and improved quality of care. Increased efficiency was perceived through timeliness as well as reduced time spent retrieving and documenting information. Quality of care was improved through care scheduling individualised to resident needs, with reminders to avoid missed care. Relatives were reassured and activities were scheduled to loved one's preferences. The co-design implementation process was successful through commitment to quality from leadership teams and prioritising the focus on the holistic needs of the residents.
conclusionA strong emphasis on co-design with care staff in developing and implementing the digital care system contributed to a system that supported nursing and care work, facilitated reporting and documentation, and improved resident care and well-being including identification of missed care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses, carers, administrators, and advocates can support the co-design creation of information systems that suit the workflow of an organisation and keep the focus on individualised models of care provision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.