Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35285398›Full record

ArticleRenal failure2022

Exploring agreement and feasibility between virtual home visits and in-person home visits for peritoneal dialysis patients-a paired study.

Jin Chen, Bo Zheng, Lijuan Yin, Qin Zhou, Wenshu Liu, Pengli Li, Xiuxiu Zhao, Xiuling Chen, Yi Li, Hanlu Ding and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEquivalence Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Renal failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jin ChenRenal Department and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinic Research Center for Kidney Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3477-5280
Bo ZhengDepartment of Sanitary Technology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lijuan YinRenal Department and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinic Research Center for Kidney Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Qin ZhouRenal Department and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinic Research Center for Kidney Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Wenshu LiuRenal Department and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinic Research Center for Kidney Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Pengli LiRenal Department and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinic Research Center for Kidney Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiuxiu ZhaoRenal Department and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinic Research Center for Kidney Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiuling ChenRenal Department and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinic Research Center for Kidney Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yi LiRenal Department and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinic Research Center for Kidney Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Hanlu DingRenal Department and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinic Research Center for Kidney Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Guisen LiRenal Department and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Clinic Research Center for Kidney Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1970-9979
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVirtual home visits may improve chronic disease management. However, whether they are suitable for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients has not yet been fully investigated. This study aimed to compare the agreement and acceptance of virtual home visits and in-person home visits in PD patients.

methodsThis was a paired, single center, noninferiority trial. Participants received a virtual home visit and an in-person home visit simultaneously. A home visit checklist was built for standardization visits. The content was divided into three parts: domestic habits (57 items), bag exchange procedures (56 items), and exit site care (53 items). Satisfaction questionnaires for both patients and nurses were designed to assess attitudes toward home visits and socioeconomic effects.

resultsA total of 30 PD patients were enrolled in a single center. The information collected from virtual home visits and in-person home visits was found to be highly consistent. The perfect agreement was found in 52/57, 49/56, and 44/53 items (Cohen's kappa 0.81-1.00), substantial agreement in 4/57, 7/56, and 8/53 items (Cohen's kappa 0.61-0.80). Patients reported almost identical satisfaction for virtual home visits and in-person home visits (

conclusionsVirtual home visits information collection was similar to in-person home visits in PD. There were no differences in participant satisfaction and feasibility between the two visit types.

Indexed as

House CallsPeritoneal DialysisFeasibility StudiesHumansPatient ComplianceSurveys and QuestionnairesagreementfeasibilityPeritoneal dialysistelehealthvirtual home visits

Identifiers

PMID35285398
PMCPMC8928823
OpenAlexW4220823519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.