Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35285172›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2022

Bile Acid-Microbiome Interaction Promotes Gastric Carcinogenesis.

Shouli Wang, Junliang Kuang, Hongwei Zhang, Wenlian Chen, Xiaojiao Zheng, Jieyi Wang, Fengjie Huang, Kun Ge, Mengci Li, Mingliang Zhao and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The emerging role of non-Gastroenterology report · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Advances inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The Potential Role ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shouli WangCenter for Translational Medicine and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Junliang KuangCenter for Translational Medicine and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Wenlian ChenCancer Institute, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Xiaojiao ZhengCenter for Translational Medicine and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Jieyi WangCenter for Translational Medicine and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Fengjie HuangCenter for Translational Medicine and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Kun GeCenter for Translational Medicine and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Mengci LiCenter for Translational Medicine and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Mingliang ZhaoCenter for Translational Medicine and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Cynthia RajaniCancer Biology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
Jinshui ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Aihua ZhaoCenter for Translational Medicine and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Wei JiaCenter for Translational Medicine and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3739-8994
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772530National Natural Science Foundation of China 81974073National Natural Science Foundation of China 82122012National Natural Science Foundation of China 82170833Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 21ZR1448800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bile reflux gastritis (BRG) is associated with the development of gastric cancer (GC), but the specific mechanism remains elusive. Here, a comprehensive study is conducted to explore the roles of refluxed bile acids (BAs) and microbiome in gastric carcinogenesis. The results show that conjugated BAs, interleukin 6 (IL-6), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and the relative abundance of LPS-producing bacteria are increased significantly in the gastric juice of both BRG and GC patients. A secondary BA, taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA), is significantly and positively correlated with the LPS-producing bacteria in the gastric juice of these patients. TDCA promotes the proliferation of normal gastric epithelial cells (GES-1) through activation of the IL-6/JAK1/STAT3 pathway. These results are further verified in two mouse models, one by gavage of TDCA, LPS, and LPS-producing bacteria (Prevotella melaninogenica), respectively, and the other by bile reflux (BR) surgery, mimicking clinical bile refluxing. Moreover, the bile reflux induced gastric precancerous lesions observed in the post BR surgery mice can be prevented by treatment with cryptotanshinone, a plant-derived STAT3 inhibitor. These results reveal an important underlying mechanism by which bile reflux promotes gastric carcinogenesis and provide an alternative strategy for the prevention of GC associated with BRG.

Indexed as

Bile RefluxCarcinogenesisGastritisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeStomach NeoplasmsTaurodeoxycholic AcidAnimalsHumansInterleukin-6LipopolysaccharidesMiceInterleukin-6LipopolysaccharidesTaurodeoxycholic Acidbile acidbile refluxgastric carcinogenesismicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID35285172
PMCPMC9165488
OpenAlexW4220814410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.