Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35285132›Full record

ReviewGenes, brain, and behavior2022

Reconsidering animal models used to study autism spectrum disorder: Current state and optimizing future.

Jill L Silverman, Audrey Thurm, Sarah B Ethridge, Makayla M Soller, Stela P Petkova, Ted Abel, Melissa D Bauman, Edward S Brodkin, Hala Harony-Nicolas, Markus Wöhr and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Auditory processing in rodent models of autism: a systematic review.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Efficacy and Safety of AltibrainCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Quo Vadis translational neuroscience?Translational neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  10. Meta-analysis ofPCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A preclinical pig model of Angelman syndrome mirrors the early developmental trajectory of the human condition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Jill L SilvermanMIND Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9357-5476
Audrey ThurmNeurodevelopmental and Behavioral Phenotyping Service, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Sarah B EthridgeNeurodevelopmental and Behavioral Phenotyping Service, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Makayla M SollerMIND Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
Stela P PetkovaMIND Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
Ted AbelDepartment of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2423-4592
Melissa D BaumanMIND Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
Edward S BrodkinDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Translational Research Laboratory, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hala Harony-NicolasSeaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Markus WöhrFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Research Unit Brain and Cognition, Laboratory of Biological Psychology, Social and Affective Neuroscience Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6986-5684
Alycia HalladayAutism Science Foundation, USA.
University of California, Davis · USNational Institute of Mental Health · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USPhilipps University of Marburg · DERutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USTranslational Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Neurodevelopmental and Behavioral Phenotyping ZICMH002961 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI THURM, AUDREY · 2017 to 2025
$12.6M
Research Project: Pathologic Significance of Maternal AutoantibodiesP50HD103526 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEONARD J. ABBEDUTO, Melissa Dawn Bauman · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
The Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC) at CHOP/PennP50HD105354 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ERIC D MARSH, ROBERT Thomas SCHULTZ · 2021 to 2026
$9.2M
University of Iowa Hawkeye Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (Hawk-IDDRC)P50HD103556 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI EDWIN TED G. ABEL, Lane Strathearn · 2021 to 2026
$8.5M
Phenotypic Characterization of Novel Models of Dup15q SyndromeR01NS097808 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SILVERMAN, JILL LYNN · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC MH002961NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103526NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103556NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105354NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097808NINDS NIH HHS R01NS097808University of Iowa Hawkeye Intellectual and Developmental Disorders Research Center P50 HD 103556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), including autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID), are pervasive, often lifelong disorders, lacking evidence-based interventions for core symptoms. With no established biological markers, diagnoses are defined by behavioral criteria. Thus, preclinical in vivo animal models of NDDs must be optimally utilized. For this reason, experts in the field of behavioral neuroscience convened a workshop with the goals of reviewing current behavioral studies, reports, and assessments in rodent models. Goals included: (a) identifying the maximal utility and limitations of behavior in animal models with construct validity; (b) providing recommendations for phenotyping animal models; and (c) guidelines on how in vivo models should be used and reported reliably and rigorously while acknowledging their limitations. We concluded by recommending minimal criteria for reporting in manuscripts going forward. The workshop elucidated a consensus of potential solutions to several problems, including revisiting claims made about animal model links to ASD (and related conditions). Specific conclusions included: mice (or other rodent or preclinical models) are models of the neurodevelopmental insult, not specifically any disorder (e.g., ASD); a model that perfectly recapitulates a disorder such as ASD is untenable; and greater attention needs be given to validation of behavioral testing methods, data analysis, and critical interpretation.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderIntellectual DisabilityNeurodevelopmental DisordersAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMiceautismbehaviordevelopmentalgeneticgenetic disorderintellectual disabilitymodelsmouse modelsneurodevelopmental disordersocialsyndrome

Identifiers

PMID35285132
PMCPMC9189007
OpenAlexW4221088095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.