Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35285023›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2022

Inter-agency collaboration is associated with increased frequency of research use in children's mental health policy making.

Jonathan Purtle, Katherine L Nelson, Rebecca Lengnick-Hall, Sarah Mc Cue Horwitz, Lawrence A Palinkas, Mary M McKay, Kimberly E Hoagwood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan PurtleDepartment of Public Health Policy & Management, School of Global Public Health, Global Center for Implementation Science, New York University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6908-5944
Katherine L NelsonDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rebecca Lengnick-HallWashington University in St. Louis, Brown School, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Sarah Mc Cue HorwitzDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Lawrence A PalinkasSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mary M McKayWashington University in St. Louis, Brown School, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Kimberly E HoagwoodDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
New York University · USWashington University in St. Louis · USCenter for Global Health · USDrexel University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

National Survey of State Policy Decision-making and SimulationP50MH113662 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOAGWOOD, KIMBERLY E. · 2019 to 2022
$6.9M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH113662NIMH NIH HHS P50MH113662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether the self-report frequency of inter-agency collaboration about children's mental health issues is associated with the self-report frequency of using research evidence in children's mental health policy and program decision making in mental health agencies (MHAs). DATA SOURCES: Primary data were collected through web-based surveys of state (N = 221) and county (N = 117) MHA officials.

designThe primary independent variable was a composite score quantifying the frequency of collaboration about children's mental health issues between officials in MHAs and six other state agencies. The dependent variables were composite scores quantifying the frequency of research use in children's mental health policy and program decision making in general and for specific purposes (i.e., conceptual, instrumental, tactical, imposed). Covariates were composite scores quantifying well-established determinants of research use (e.g., agency leadership, research use skills) in agency policy and program decision making. DATA

methodsSeparate multiple linear regression models estimated associations between frequency of inter-agency collaboration and research use scores, adjusting for other determinants of research use, respondent state, and other covariates. Data from state and county officials were analyzed separately. PRINCIPAL

findingsThe frequency of inter-agency collaboration was positively and independently associated with the frequency of research use in children's mental health policy making among state (β = 0.22, p = 0.004) and county (β = 0.39, p < 0.0001) MHA officials. Inter-agency collaboration was also the only variable significantly associated with the frequency of research use for all four specific purposes among state MHA officials, and similar findings we observed among county MHA officials. The magnitudes of associations between inter-agency collaboration and frequency of research use were generally stronger than for more well-established determinants of research use in policy making.

conclusionsStrategies that promote collaboration between MHA officials and external agencies could increase the use of research evidence in children's mental health policy and program decision making in MHAs.

Indexed as

Child HealthChild Health ServicesChildHealth PolicyHumansPolicy MakingState Governmentchildreninter-agency collaborationmental healthpublic policyuse of research evidence

Identifiers

PMID35285023
PMCPMC9264471
OpenAlexW4221013311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.