Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284999›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2022

New Versus Old: The Impact of Changing Patterns of Inhaled Corticosteroid Prescribing and Dosing Regimens in Asthma Management.

Dave Singh, Gabriel Garcia, Kittipong Maneechotesuwan, Peter Daley-Yates, Elvis Irusen, Bhumika Aggarwal, Isabelle Boucot, Norbert Berend

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Patterns of bronchodilator therapy in asthmatic outpatients.Journal of public health in Africa · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Dave SinghMedicines Evaluation Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8918-7075
Gabriel GarciaPulmonary Chest Services, Hospital R Rossi, La Plata, Argentina.
Kittipong ManeechotesuwanDivision of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Peter Daley-YatesClinical Pharmacology and Experimental Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Research and Development, Uxbridge, UK. peter.t.daley-yates@gsk.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0684-5621
Elvis IrusenDivision of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2134-3251
Bhumika AggarwalRegional Respiratory Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Singapore, 139234, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-9319
Isabelle BoucotRegional Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Brentford, UK.
Norbert BerendGlaxoSmithKline plc., Boronia, VIC, Australia.
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (Australia) · AUHospital Italiano La Plata · ARManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBSiriraj Hospital · THStellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapies are the mainstay of pharmacological management of asthma. They can be administered alone or in combination with a long-acting bronchodilator, depending on asthma severity, and may also be supplemented with short-acting bronchodilators for as-needed rescue medication. Adherence to asthma therapies is generally poor and characterized by underuse of ICS therapies and over-reliance on short-acting bronchodilators, which leads to poor clinical outcomes. This article reviews efficacy versus systemic activity profiles for various dosing regimens of budesonide (BUD) and fluticasone propionate (FP). We performed a structured literature review of BUD and FP regular daily dosing, and BUD/formoterol (FOR) as-needed dosing, to explore the relationship between various dosing patterns of ICS regimens and the risk-benefit profile in terms of the extent of bronchoprotection and cortisol suppression. In addition, we explored how adherence could potentially affect the risk-benefit profile, in patients with mild, moderate, and moderate-to-severe asthma. With a specific focus on BUD or FP-containing treatments, we found that regular daily ICS and ICS/long-acting β

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluticasoneFormoterol FumarateHumansAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluticasoneFormoterol FumarateAs-needed dosingAsthmaBronchoprotectionBudesonideFluticasone propionateInhaled corticosteroidRegular maintenance dosingRisk benefitSystemic effects

Identifiers

PMID35284999
PMCPMC9056489
OpenAlexW4220936373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.