Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284858›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases2021

Comparative studies on faecal egg counting techniques used for the detection of gastrointestinal parasites of equines: A systematic review.

Abdul Ghafar, Ghazanfar Abbas, Justine King, Caroline Jacobson, Kristopher J Hughes, Charles El-Hage, Anne Beasley, Jenni Bauquier, Edwina J A Wilkes, John Hurley and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Validation of Vetscan ImagystParasites & vectors · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. First microscopic and molecular parasitological survey of Strongylus vulgaris in Brazilian ponies.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdul GhafarMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Ghazanfar AbbasMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Justine KingMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Caroline JacobsonCentre for Animal Production and Health, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Kristopher J HughesSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Charles El-HageMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Anne BeasleySchool of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia.
Jenni BauquierMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Edwina J A WilkesSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
John HurleySwettenham Stud, Nagambie, Victoria, Australia.
Lucy CudmoreScone Equine Hospital, Scone, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter CarriganScone Equine Hospital, Scone, New South Wales, Australia.
Brett Tennent-BrownMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Martin K NielsenM.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Charles G GauciMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Ian BeveridgeMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Abdul JabbarMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUCharles Sturt University · AUMurdoch University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faecal egg counting techniques (FECT) form the cornerstone for the detection of gastrointestinal parasites in equines. For this purpose, several flotation, centrifugation, image- and artificial intelligence-based techniques are used, with varying levels of performance. This review aimed to critically appraise the literature on the assessment and comparison of various coprological techniques and/or modifications of these techniques used for equines and to identify the knowledge gaps and future research directions. We searched three databases for published scientific studies on the assessment and comparison of FECT in equines and included 27 studies in the final synthesis. Overall, the performance parameters of McMaster (81.5%), Mini-FLOTAC® (33.3%) and simple flotation (25.5%) techniques were assessed in most of the studies, with 77.8% of them comparing the performance of at least two or three methods. The detection of strongyle,

Indexed as

AnoplocephalaAscaridComparisonEquineFaecal egg counting techniqueStrongyle

Identifiers

PMID35284858
PMCPMC8906068
OpenAlexW3188201525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.