ArticleResuscitation plus2022
Code status orders in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Family satisfaction with the end-of-life discussions and resuscitation orders for patients with severe COVID-19: a multicenter study in Saudi Arabia.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders by COVID-19 Status Throughout the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Chest · 2024Article
- Change in Code Status Orders of Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19 Throughout the Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of palliative medicine · 2023Article
- Admission Code Status and End-of-life Care for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Code status orders impact clinical outcomes as well as patients' and surrogates' experiences. This is the first multicenter cohort examining code status orders of ICU patients with COVID-19 reported to date. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including adult patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were admitted to the ICU at three hospitals in Massachusetts from March 11, 2020 - May 31, 2020. We examined differences in code status orders at multiple timepoints and performed multivariable regression analysis to identify variables associated with code status at admission. Results: Among 459 ICU patients with COVID-19, 421 (91.7%) were Full Code at hospital admission. Age and admission from a facility were positively associated with DNR status (adjusted OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15, p < 0.001 and adjusted OR 2.68, CI 1.23-5.71, p = 0.011, respectively) while non-English preferred language was negatively associated with DNR status (adjusted OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.74, p = 0.012). Among 147 patients who died during hospitalization, 95.2% (140) died with DNR code status; most (86.4%) died within two days of final code status change. Conclusions: The association of non-English preferred language with Full Code status in critically ill COVID-19 patients highlights the importance of medical interpreters in the ICU. Patients who died were transitioned to DNR more than in previous studies, possibly reflecting changes in practice during a novel pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.