Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284805›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Ethnic inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health interventions in Ecuador: A study of the 2004 and 2012 national surveys.

Paulina Rios-Quituizaca, Giovanna Gatica-Domínguez, Devaki Nambiar, Jair L Ferreira Santos, Aluisio J D Barros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Altitude and risk of pre-eclampsia: insights from a large-scale epidemiological study in Ecuador.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paulina Rios-QuituizacaFacultad de Ciencias Medicas, Universidad Central del Ecuador. Facultad de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto, Universidad de São Paulo. La Armenia, Quito, Ecuador.
Giovanna Gatica-DomínguezInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brazil.
Devaki NambiarThe George Institute for Global Health, Delhi, India.
Jair L Ferreira SantosFacultad de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto- USP, Universidad de São Paulo, Brazil.
Aluisio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brazil.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-007594Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Analysis of health inequalities by ethnicity is critical to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. In Ecuador, similar to other Latin American countries, indigenous and afro-descendant populations have long been subject to racism, discrimination, and inequitable treatment. Although in recent years, Ecuador has made progress in health indicators, particularly those related to the coverage of Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health (RMNCH) interventions, little is known as to whether inequalities by ethnicity persist. Methods: Analysis was based on two nationally representative health surveys (2004 and 2012). Ethnicity was self-reported and classified into three categories (Indigenous/Afro-Ecuadorian/Mixed ancestry). Coverage data for six RMNCH health interventions were stratified for each ethnic group by level of education, area of residence and wealth quintiles. Absolute inequality measures were computed and multivariate analysis using Poisson regression was undertaken. Findings: In 2012, 74.4% of women self-identifying as indigenous did not achieve the secondary level of education and 50.7% were in the poorest quintile (Q1); this profile was relatively unchanged since 2004. From 2004 to 2012, the coverage of RMNCH interventions increased for all ethnic groups, and absolute inequality decreased. However, in 2012, regardless of education level, area of residence and wealth quintiles, ethnic inequalities remained for almost all RMNCH interventions. Indigenous women had 24% lower prevalence of modern contraceptive use (Prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.76; 95% IC: 0.7-0.8); 28% lower prevalence of antenatal care (PR = 0.72; 95% IC: 0.6-0.8); and 35% lower prevalence of skilled birth attendance and institutional delivery (PR = 0.65; 95% IC: 0.6-0.7 and PR = 0.65; 95% IC: 0.6-0.7 respectively), compared with the majority ethnic group in the country. Interpretation: While the gaps have narrowed, indigenous people in Ecuador continue in a situation of structural racism and are left behind in terms of access to RMNCH interventions. Strategies to reduce ethnic inequalities in the coverage services need to be collaboratively redesigned/co-designed. Funding: This paper was made possible with funds from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [Grant Number: INV-007,594/OPP1148933].

Indexed as

CI, confidence intervalCVD, national survey of living conditionsECLAC, economic commission for Latin America and the CaribbeanENSANUT, national survey of health and nutrition (encuesta nacional de salud y nutrición)Ethnic groupsHealthcare disparitiesHealth care surveysICEH, international center for equity in healthINEC, national institute of statistics and censuses (instituto nacional de estadísticas y censos)LA, Latin AmericaMaternal-child health services continuity of patient carePR, prevalence ratioRHS, reproductive health surveyRMNCH, reproductive, maternal, neonatal and childrenUBN, unsatisfied basic needs or NBI, (acronym in Spanish) a multidimensional poverty measureWRA, women in reproductive age

Identifiers

PMID35284805
PMCPMC8904232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.