ArticleACS omega2022
Temperature of the Core Tube Wall during Coring in Coal Seam: Experiment and Modeling.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generation of cutting heat and simulation of core tube wall temperature during coring in primary structure coal seam.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Low-Temperature Response Characteristics of Coalbed Methane Desorption under High and Low Destruction Degrees.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Research on Factors and Influencing Correlation of Coal Core Temperature during Coring.ACS omega · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temperature is the primary factor affecting the law of coal gas desorption. When the core method is used to measure the coal seam gas content (CSGC), the temperature of the coal core sample (CCS) will increase because the heat generated by the core bit cutting and rubbing the coal is transferred to the CCS through the core tube. To solve the above problems, the temperature of the core tube wall during coring at core depths of 10, 20, and 30 m was measured by a self-designed temperature measuring device. The thermodynamic models of the core bit and the core tube during coring were established. The thermal flux of the system at different stages was inverted numerically by the dichotomy method. The reliability of the model was verified by comparing the numerical simulation results with the field measurement results. The main influencing factors during coring were studied by numerical simulations. The results show that the temperature change of the core tube wall goes through four stages: slowly rising, fast rising, slowly rising, and slowly falling, which correspond to the process of pushing the core tube, drilling the CCS, and the early stage and later stage of withdrawing the core tube, respectively. The maximum temperature of the core tube wall appears in the first 5 min of withdrawing the core tube and increases with the increase of core depth. When the core depth is 30 m, the maximum temperature of the core tube wall reaches 105.17 °C. The temperature of the measuring point at the end of drilling the CCS and the maximum temperature during coring linearly increase with the core depth, friction heat generated while pushing the core tube, and coal strength. This study can provide a basis for further research on the dynamic distribution characteristics of temperature in the CCS during coring, which is of profound significance to calculate the gas loss amount and CSGC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.