ArticleTurkish journal of emergency medicine
Development of a nomogram to predict the outcome of moderate or severe pediatric traumatic brain injury.
Article in Turkish journal of emergency medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting 30-day in-hospital mortality in children with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Dynamic nomogram for predicting long-term survival in patients with brain abscess.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury in Southern Thailand.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a dynamic nomogram for acute kidney injury prediction in ICU patients with acute heart failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram-based risk prediction model for unfavorable outcomes in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Development of clinical decision support for patients older than 65 years with fall-related TBI using artificial intelligence modeling.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTraumatic brain injury (TBI) in children has become the major cause of mortality and morbidity in Thailand that has had an impact with economic consequences. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a nomogram for a 6-month follow-up outcome prediction in moderate or severe pediatric TBI.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study involved 104 children with moderate or severe TBI. Various clinical variables were reviewed. The functional outcome was assessed at the hospital discharge and at a 6-month follow-up based on the King's Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury classification. Predictors associated with the 6-month follow-up outcome were developed from the predictive model using multivariable binary logistic regression to estimate the performance and internal validation. A nomogram was developed and presented as a predictive model.
resultsThe mean age of the samples was 99.75 months (standard deviation 59.65). Road traffic accidents were the highest injury mechanism at 84.6%. The predictive model comprised Glasgow Coma Scale of 3-8 (odds ratio [OR]: 16.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-202.42), pupillary response in one eye (OR 7.74; 95% CI 1.26-47.29), pupillary nonresponse in both eyes (OR: 57.74; 95% CI: 2.28-145.81), hypotension (OR: 19.54; 95%: CI 3.23-117.96), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR: 9.01, 95% CI: 1.33-60.80). The concordance statistic index (C-index) of the model's discrimination was 0.931, while the C-index following the bootstrapping and 5-cross validation were 0.920 and 0.924, respectively.
conclusionsThe performance of a clinical nomogram for predicting 6-month follow-up outcomes in pediatric TBI patients was assessed at an excellent level. However, further external validation would be required for the confirmation of the tool's performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.