Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35284663›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2022

A statistical, voxelised model of prostate cancer for biologically optimised radiotherapy.

Robert N Finnegan, Hayley M Reynolds, Martin A Ebert, Yu Sun, Lois Holloway, Jonathan R Sykes, Jason Dowling, Catherine Mitchell, Scott G Williams, Declan G Murphy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nested CNN architecture for three-dimensional dose distribution prediction in tomotherapy for prostate cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  3. Dosimetric impact of variable air cavity within PTV for rectum cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robert N FinneganInstitute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Hayley M ReynoldsAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Martin A EbertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Yu SunInstitute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lois HollowayInstitute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jonathan R SykesInstitute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jason DowlingInstitute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Catherine MitchellDepartment of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Scott G WilliamsSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Declan G MurphySir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Annette HaworthInstitute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Radiation therapy (RT) is commonly indicated for treatment of prostate cancer (PC). Biologicallyoptimised RT for PC may improve disease-free survival. This requires accurate spatial localisation and characterisation of tumour lesions. We aimed to generate a statistical, voxelised biological model to complement Material and methods: Ex vivo prostate MRI and histopathological imaging were acquired for 63 PC patients. These data were co-registered to derive three-dimensional distributions of graded tumour lesions and cell density. Novel registration processes were used to map these data to a common reference geometry. Voxelised statistical models of tumour probability and cell density were generated to create the PC biological atlas. Cell density models were analysed using the Kullback-Leibler divergence to compare normal vs. lognormal approximations to empirical data. Results: A reference geometry was constructed using ex vivo MRI space, patient data were deformably registered using a novel anatomy-guided process. Substructure correspondence was maintained using peripheral zone definitions to address spatial variability in prostate anatomy between patients. Three distinct approaches to interpolation were designed to map contours, tumour annotations and cell density maps from histology into ex vivo MRI space. Analysis suggests a log-normal model provides a more consistent representation of cell density when compared to a linear-normal model. Conclusion: A biological model has been created that combines spatial distributions of tumour characteristics from a population into three-dimensional, voxelised, statistical models. This tool will be used to aid the development of biologically-optimised RT for PC patients.

Indexed as

Biological atlasProstate cancerRadiobiologyStatistical atlasTumor biology

Identifiers

PMID35284663
PMCPMC8913349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.