ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
A novel 12-gene prognostic signature in breast cancer based on the tumor microenvironment.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- MEOX1 Inhibits Growth and Metastasis of Salivary Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Subtype-Stratified Consensus Gene Signatures: Bridging Tumor Cell Biology, Immune Microenvironment, and Clinical Prognosis in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Extending differential gene expression testing to handle genome aneuploidy in cancer.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- SIGLEC1 has the potential to be an immune-related prognostic indicator in colon adenocarcinoma: a study based on transcriptomic data and Mendelian randomization analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the key mechanisms of FOLR2+ macrophage-mediated antitumor immunity in breast cancer using integrated single-cell RNA sequencing and bulk RNA sequencing.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Transcription factorBiomolecules & biomedicine · 2024Article
- Single-cell resolution characterization of myeloid-derived cell states with implication in cancer outcome.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- BHLHE22 Expression Is Associated with a Proinflammatory Immune Microenvironment and Confers a Favorable Prognosis in Endometrial Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Smart Nanoparticles for Breast Cancer Treatment Based on the Tumor Microenvironment.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Identification and validation of a 17-gene signature to improve the survival prediction of gliomas.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- A necroptosis -related signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The progression of breast cancer (BC) is highly dependent on the tumor microenvironment. Inflammation, stromal cells, and the immune landscape have been identified as significant drivers of BC in multiple preclinical studies. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the predictive relevance of stromal and immune cell-associated genes in patients suffering from BC. Methods: We employed the estimation of stromal and immune cells in malignant tumor tissues using expression data (ESTIMATE) algorithm to calculate the stromal and immunological scores, which were then used to evaluate differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in BC samples using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Univariate analyses were conducted to identify the DEGs linked to survival in BC patients. Next, the prognostic DEGs (with a log-rank P<0.05) were used to create a risk signature, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method was used to analyze and optimize the risk signature. The following formula was used to compute the prognostic risk score values: Risk score = Gene 1 * β1 + Gene 2 * β2 +… Gene n * βn. The median prognostic risk score values were used to divide BC patients into the low-risk (LR) and high-risk (HR) groups. The patient samples of the validation cohort were then assessed using this formula. We used principal component analysis (PCA) to determine the expression patterns of the different patient groups. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was used to determine whether there were significant variations between the groups in the evaluated gene sets. Results: The present study revealed that DEGs linked with survival were closely associated with immunological responses. A prognostic signature was constructed that consisted of 12 genes ( Conclusions: Our results provide novel insights into several microenvironment-linked genes that influence survival outcomes in patients with BC, which suggests that these genes could be candidate therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.